Full EP. Apologist WRONG About Dead Sea Scrolls! - Ft Dr. Kipp Davis

preview_player
Показать описание
Full EP. Apologist WRONG About Dead Sea Scrolls! - Ft Dr. @DrKippDavis

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

What? If the question is whether or not the text has been 'corrupted' beyond meaning or changed, as is often repeated, then the DSS show that that's just not the case.

How is that intellectually dishonest?

Narikku
Автор

Since when did you expect intellectual honesty from Christian apologists?

robinharwood
Автор

Awesome 👍🏽, also the D.S.S. Identifies “ the book of Ruth “ as later added scripture, similar to an Albums Remixed 💿 added EP

ZnHolEminD
Автор

I hate to argue but here goes christians. BEFORE the disvovery of DSS sceptics argued the oldest OT manuscript we had was Codex Leningrad 1000AD. Hence integrity questionable. After duscovery of DSS the Masoretic tradition is still questionable. Hence sceptics NEVER HAPPY

Joe-bwew
Автор

I don't suppose you could... You know... Give an example of that "intellectual dishonesty"? What's that? Crickets? Thought so.

fluffysheap
Автор

So the D.S.S. and the Hebrew scriptures (Tanakh) are almost completely identical to the corresponding extant D.S.S.? Christians will hate this because their prophecies for Jesus were extracted by using the Septuagint as a sort of Bible Code.

edwardmiessner