filmov
tv
Warren Buffett EXPLAINS WHY HE SOLD McDonald's 🍔🍟 Everything he ever said about the sale 🥤
Показать описание
Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger explain why they sold McDonald's and also admit it was a big mistake.
This is everything they ever said about the sale of their McDonald's stake
In 1996, Warren Buffett bought shares in McDonald's, but within just 12 months, he sold them again.
This is not typical of Buffett, who is known for holding his stocks for many years.
In this clip, he explains everything you need to know about the sale.
He also compares McDonald's to Coca-Cola and Gillette, and discusses the difference between the food industry and the consumer product industry.
------------------
It’s not our natural inclination to sell.
And on the other hand — and we have held the Washington Post stock since 1973. I’ve never sold a share of Berkshire, having bought the first shares in 1962.
And we’ve held Coke stock since 1988. We’ve held Gillette stock since 1989. Held American Express stock since 1991.
We sell — really when we think that we’ve — when we’re reevaluating the economic characteristics of the business.
We probably had one view of the long-term competitive advantage of the company at the time we bought it, and we may have modified that.
We think McDonald’s has a fine future. We think Disney has a fine future.
But we probably don’t think that their competitive advantage is as strong as we might have thought — as we thought it was — when we initially made the decision.
We think that the strengths may have been eroded to some degree.
A classic case on that would be the newspaper industry, generally, for example.
I mean, in 1970, Charlie and I were looking at the newspaper business. We felt it was about as impregnable a franchise as could be found.
We still think it’s quite a business, but we do not think the franchise in 2002 is the same as it was in 1970.
We do not think the franchise of a network television station in 2002 is the same as it was in 1965.
I said it was a mistake to sell it, and it was a mistake. And I just reported that in the interest of candor.
But I didn’t think it belonged in the list of eight or 10 of the businesses, of the very few businesses, that we want to own in the world
My guess is that with 23,000 locations all over the world, I think it would be extraordinarily difficult to separate the real estate business out from the franchising business at this point.
But I just think the problems would be horrendous. Certainly you wouldn’t want to sell it and lease it back because you would not end up with more value, in my view, by doing that.
And spinning it off in a real estate trust or something, with operating in 100-plus countries, and with all of the franchise arrangements, I think it would be a huge, huge problem.
You should look at McDonald’s as being a very good business, but one that will continue in its present mode vis a vis the real estate.
And the multiple is not greatly different, in my view, than if the real estate were separate
You won’t get the inevitability in food that you will get in a single consumer product, you know, such as blades
They’re happy with the product.
Decisions on fast food, as to where you eat, is simply based on which one you see. I mean, convenience is a huge factor.
If you are going by a McDonald’s, or a Burger King, or a Wendy’s, and you happen to be hungry at that point, if you’re traveling on the road and you see one of those signs up, you’re probably going to stop at the one you see.
Most people want to vary where they eat as they go through the week, or the month, or the year.
They don’t really have any great desire to vary their soft drink the same way. It’s not the same thing.
So it’s no knock on McDonald’s at all. It’s just the nature of the kind of industry they’re in.
One of the ones I admire most is McDonald’s.
I had fun once at a major university when I said I thought McDonald’s succeeded better as an educator than the people in the university did.
And what I meant was McDonald’s hires a lot of people who are quite marginal at the very start of their working career. And they learn to show up on time for work and observe the discipline.
A lot of them go on in employment to much higher jobs. And they’ve had an enormous constructive effect about educating into responsibility a lot of people who were threatened with not making it.
So I think we all owe a lot to the employment culture of McDonald’s. And it’s not enough appreciated.
This is everything they ever said about the sale of their McDonald's stake
In 1996, Warren Buffett bought shares in McDonald's, but within just 12 months, he sold them again.
This is not typical of Buffett, who is known for holding his stocks for many years.
In this clip, he explains everything you need to know about the sale.
He also compares McDonald's to Coca-Cola and Gillette, and discusses the difference between the food industry and the consumer product industry.
------------------
It’s not our natural inclination to sell.
And on the other hand — and we have held the Washington Post stock since 1973. I’ve never sold a share of Berkshire, having bought the first shares in 1962.
And we’ve held Coke stock since 1988. We’ve held Gillette stock since 1989. Held American Express stock since 1991.
We sell — really when we think that we’ve — when we’re reevaluating the economic characteristics of the business.
We probably had one view of the long-term competitive advantage of the company at the time we bought it, and we may have modified that.
We think McDonald’s has a fine future. We think Disney has a fine future.
But we probably don’t think that their competitive advantage is as strong as we might have thought — as we thought it was — when we initially made the decision.
We think that the strengths may have been eroded to some degree.
A classic case on that would be the newspaper industry, generally, for example.
I mean, in 1970, Charlie and I were looking at the newspaper business. We felt it was about as impregnable a franchise as could be found.
We still think it’s quite a business, but we do not think the franchise in 2002 is the same as it was in 1970.
We do not think the franchise of a network television station in 2002 is the same as it was in 1965.
I said it was a mistake to sell it, and it was a mistake. And I just reported that in the interest of candor.
But I didn’t think it belonged in the list of eight or 10 of the businesses, of the very few businesses, that we want to own in the world
My guess is that with 23,000 locations all over the world, I think it would be extraordinarily difficult to separate the real estate business out from the franchising business at this point.
But I just think the problems would be horrendous. Certainly you wouldn’t want to sell it and lease it back because you would not end up with more value, in my view, by doing that.
And spinning it off in a real estate trust or something, with operating in 100-plus countries, and with all of the franchise arrangements, I think it would be a huge, huge problem.
You should look at McDonald’s as being a very good business, but one that will continue in its present mode vis a vis the real estate.
And the multiple is not greatly different, in my view, than if the real estate were separate
You won’t get the inevitability in food that you will get in a single consumer product, you know, such as blades
They’re happy with the product.
Decisions on fast food, as to where you eat, is simply based on which one you see. I mean, convenience is a huge factor.
If you are going by a McDonald’s, or a Burger King, or a Wendy’s, and you happen to be hungry at that point, if you’re traveling on the road and you see one of those signs up, you’re probably going to stop at the one you see.
Most people want to vary where they eat as they go through the week, or the month, or the year.
They don’t really have any great desire to vary their soft drink the same way. It’s not the same thing.
So it’s no knock on McDonald’s at all. It’s just the nature of the kind of industry they’re in.
One of the ones I admire most is McDonald’s.
I had fun once at a major university when I said I thought McDonald’s succeeded better as an educator than the people in the university did.
And what I meant was McDonald’s hires a lot of people who are quite marginal at the very start of their working career. And they learn to show up on time for work and observe the discipline.
A lot of them go on in employment to much higher jobs. And they’ve had an enormous constructive effect about educating into responsibility a lot of people who were threatened with not making it.
So I think we all owe a lot to the employment culture of McDonald’s. And it’s not enough appreciated.
Комментарии