The Three Mile Island Melt Up

preview_player
Показать описание
Microsoft and nuclear plant owner Constellation have entered into an unprecedented deal to restart Three Mile Island by 2028 to power its data centers.

Microsoft will purchase as much power as possible from its 880 MW reactor over 20 years for prices rumored to be above $100 per MWh.

Most famous for its 1979 meltdown, TMI closed in 2019 because of cheap fossil fuels and tech companies refusing at the time to consider buying its electricity to meet clean energy goals.

Listen to Decouple on:

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

It’s mandatory for nuclear advocates to have mustaches.

literallyshaking
Автор

God 20 minutes isnt enough time with Mark Nelson. I could listen to him for hours, he really is one of my favorite return and guests. Still a good podcast though.

Cameronmid
Автор

Marks mustache needs it's own podcast 😂

lancobear
Автор

The difference between the few hundred million dollars needed for upgrades before the decision to close the unit and the $1.6 billion to return the unit to service is probably mostly the costs of reassembling a staff, retraining them, figuring out what the licensing process and requirements are for restarting a plant that gave up its previous operating license and doing a few months of startup and commissioning tests. Had the plants done the upgrades without retiring the unit, they would have done them gradually, over say 6 to 8 years, doing them in parallel with the normal refueling outages.

To put personnel costs into perspective, the annual cost of the staff needed at an operating reactor just for routine operation and maintenance of the plant, without any special work such as major refurbishments and relicensing, is in the range of $110 to $120 million per year. Just the personnel costs of a 3 or 4 year restart effort will be quite large.

thomasgreene
Автор

As anyone who has done home renovation knows, when you start digging around, you discover new unexpected problems... It will end up costing more than $1.6 billion.

Alex_Plante
Автор

OK, now I'm kind of pissed! The existing fleet of legacy reactors has been paid for by consumers of electricity paying their electricity bills. Yeah, sure the plants get sold and resold to different management companies but they were bought and paid for by utility bill payers whether they are residential electric business, electric or industrial electric users. If a company wants to make a deal with data centers to open up closed legacy fleet machines that's one thing. it's also another thing if data center companies want to build their own nuclear power plants to provide clean electricity. But I feel the existing fleet belongs to the citizens and businesses that have been paying the bills for all these decades.

scottmedwid
Автор

My new fav channel I have 3 like three tabs open to go back and watch! Thx for the content!!

remzo
Автор

Great show and congratulations to Mark!

manatoa
Автор

Amazing news! Let's hope more will follow.

Atomicjedi
Автор

Years ago I traveled to Columbia University (when it was still a University, not a Madrassa) to hear Jimmy Rogers explain his value investing methods. As I said in the back of the class, I remember how he tracked the nuclear industry presumably in the process of ruin, and pointed out where opportunities were hiding (in some bonds, if I remember). In retrospect, he hit it as close to the bottom as was humanly possible. And that's for an outsider who knew little about the industry except for what he picked up from the financials. My conclusion then (which persists): If you want to make a bundle, focus on necessary industries when they are in the dumps, and talk to insiders to learn what they think are the essential fundamentals.

thesleuthinvestor
Автор

Well well well if it isn’t my favourite podcast

Whayles
Автор

Been literally 40 years we've (when we were decommissioning Shippingport PA) been consistently saying we needed to be building plants around the US while watching stupid media pushed decisions trying to stop building out and then shutting down plants. Unfortunately where we are is pretty much what we expected, except we hoped there would be some leap in wind or solar or tidal or geothermal to take up the gap. Instead it's going the other way and nuclear would be SO much cheaper now if it hadn't been essentially abandoned back then.

Scoots
Автор

Article on this topic in the Washington Post today. Predictably with their readership, 99% of the 1, 300 comments so far are, shall we say, unfavorable, and almost entirely (if not all, I didn’t read all, but all of the ones for which I had the patience) out of impassioned ignorance. We could hope that folks will be influenced by inflation, and the growing, insatiable US debt, expected to exceed our GDP this year. Unsustainable, yet far less painful with the availability of abundant, clean, 24/7/365 energy.

happyhome
Автор

I am so glad that USA returning for nuclear power! The only problem is industrial base. Is USA capable to produce high pressure vessels and turbines?

yurialtunin
Автор

I've got a problem with the revenu assumption 800MWe * 24h * 42 weeks (with ~80% capacity factor) * 100$ = ~80 millions $, not 800, am I wrong here?

blahblah-ssyk
Автор

What happens to Data Center power supply when nuclear plant needs to shut-down for re-fueling?

clifforddicarlo
Автор

Depending on the presidential outcome fracking may be back on the table in a big way. How will this impact nuclear/

bobdeverell
Автор

As a local resident we dont want this. Also its not even for residents its 100 percent for useless Microsoft tech.

RodimusPrime
Автор

Mark, paint the whole picture…Offshore wind in New England is 140-180USD/MWh including new grid transmission and 50-60 capacity factors vs >100USD/MWh for 80% capacity factor for refurbishing an already existing power plant and transmission. A brand new nuclear power plant in the US would be over 200 USD/MWh if it can be delivered.

dankspain
Автор

Mark is angry because Nuclear cannot compete with other sources of electricity in the spot market. Kicking and mocking PhDs because you cant or are not willing to understand how electricity markets work is not the way to promote nuclear.

dankspain