Panasonic DMC-FZ1000 vs Sony DSC-RX10

FZ1000 is first. Tried to find the same settings. FZ1000 shot in 4K. Both shots were stabilized in post (Prodad Mercalli). Then reduced to 1080P. The RX10 deliveres very good FHD but the better image quality of the FZ1000 is clearly visible. Unfortunately both cameras doen't have a good stabilizer. The one of the Sony is very poor. So it i had to stabilize it.

[JoeSzilagy]

Yes, a big difference! But I imagine the next version of the RX10 will probably be quite amazing! However, you're making me not want to wait for whenever it comes out, and get the FZ1000 instead!

[az]

The footage of the Lumix looks very good, except the intense rolling shutter.
But: What the hell did you do with your RX10 footage to look so awful? I also own the RX10, but the image is not nearly comparable to your sample, in 1080p the image quality of both cameras should be broadly similar... Maybe you shot in 720p instead of 1080p?

[minzawone]

FZ1000 all the way Versatility 4K and price

[ChrispyArt]

Are you using the latest firmware on the Sony with XAVC S ?

[kayp]

its look like first from sony rx10 and second from panasonic fz1000 . i know carlzeiss and leica colors . if its not t mistake than panasonic is great ....

[wpdesign]

Przez dłuższy czas podziwiałem SonyRX10, ale kupiłem PanasonicFZ1000. Dlaczego? Głownie dlatego, że ma normalny obrotowy wyświetlacz. Czy Sony nie zdaje sobie sprawy z tego, że jego wyświetlacze nie są ani stałe, ani obrotowe, i że własnie to obrzydza ten aparacik?!