VP debate winner ‘depends on your yard stick’: O’Reilly | Morning in America

Who walked away from Tuesday night’s vice presidential debate on top? Bill O’Reilly says “it depends on your yard stick.” He says Tim Walz came across as an “uncle,” while JD Vance looked more presidential.

#JDVance #TimWalz #BillOReilly

Start your day with "Morning in America," NewsNation's live three-hour national morning newscast hosted by Markie Martin. Weekdays starting at 6a/5C. #MorningInAmerica

NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.

[kathyhenry]

Bill you were very gracious to Walz. Vance was absolutely ON POINT.

[dougbesplug]

I think Vance looked really good very professional

[gregblum]

Vance did a great job, but the truth is always easier, that's why walz looked so bad

[Peter]

Re. Waltz NewsNation: there must be a pony in there somewhere, if I keep digging and digging and digging.

[ryanthrives]

Funny how the VP candidates actually have competent things to say, meanwhile our presidential puppets are both morons.

[kten]

lol which 1 didn't lie as much definitely not vance

[TopGuardDawg]

Vance was good and respectful im thinking of voting for Trump this year

[f.m.]

Did O‘Reill just say Iran pushed the US to invade Iraq after he was the main cheerleader in the media for that?! Am I dreaming?

[PS-uekd]

Sound conceded, you are conceded Bill O’Reilly

[gregblum]

Vote policies and record not gender and race. Vote Dems out they have done enough

[merialusher]

Man Bill ORiley you way off. Vance did a remarkable job.

[kenthonea]

Oreily is a joke does he have dementia now ?

[russoley]

Walz looks as old as O Reilly time for both to move to the pasture

[kathleenglenn]

Vance is so smart. Walz isn't. Vance won hands down. He'll be PREZ sone dsy.

[Rickis_Radio]

This channel has less credibility than cnn.

[IstandwithVPKAMALA]

How was Vance the winner when he ducked and dodged the questions??? How sway?

[Tony]

It was mostly civil. I liked that. Vance was civil but he did tell lies. Walz was civil but he didn't defend the truth to my satisfaction. I think that the reason it was civil is because they were attacking the records of Trump and Harris and the attacks weren't personal. I give Vance points for professionalism and composure and I give Walz points for tenacity and honesty. I don't see any clear winner. Here's the problem with these debates, there's no time to do anything but scratch the surface of each issue. We didn't learn anything meaningful. There wasn't enough time for Vance to prove to me that, what I detected as lies, was in fact true. And there wasn't enough time for Walz to prove Vance wrong. So in the end I saw Vance as hypocritical and Walz as too eager but ineffective.

[merriemelodiesfan]

This debate was a wash. Vance seemingly look polish, but when he was asked about January 6, 2021, that's where he screwed up IMO. He walked that Trumpian line. Vance didn't look presidential. The fact that he can't admit that his running mate lost the last presidential election and actually tried to challenged the results of that election should be disqualifying for him as VP.

[Xfranman]

O'Reilly is neither historian nor journalist. He's a loudmouth know-it-all. Vance won. End of discussion. O'Reilly can go back to his nap.