filmov
tv
'Self-Help' Books Are Nonsense. Here's Why

Показать описание
Self-help books are not mere motivational mumbo-jumbo. They (often) sleazily conceal a political point-of-view that reinforces the political establishment. Here's how.
References:
9. Film: Che (2008)
10. And, obviously, used the Marx-quote on religion from the Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Obviously.
There are already some videos dissecting self-help from a Marxist POV. If you're interested, watch Jacobin's videos on self-help and the hustle culture. Thsoe videos, too, served as references when I was making this video (in a more accessible and jargon-free way, obviously).
The example for "clean up your room before you go out and criticize the world" is a nod to the Zizek-Peterson debate.
Also, the books shown in the intro are just examples of books. Not that I necessarily endorse them. While I do acknowledge the contribution of New Atheism, I find their overall analysis to be ahistorical and mostly idealist in nature (contrary to the Marxist analysis of similar societal structures).
4:00 - I illustrated the example of the D-P-R-K because that's far more accessible as an example. My views have since changed on the D-P-R-K and, while I do have my reservations about some of their policies, I would refrain from criticizing them along the "free speech" line. I find their policies far less objectionable (in total) when compared to the policies enacted by the so-called "free world".
References:
9. Film: Che (2008)
10. And, obviously, used the Marx-quote on religion from the Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Obviously.
There are already some videos dissecting self-help from a Marxist POV. If you're interested, watch Jacobin's videos on self-help and the hustle culture. Thsoe videos, too, served as references when I was making this video (in a more accessible and jargon-free way, obviously).
The example for "clean up your room before you go out and criticize the world" is a nod to the Zizek-Peterson debate.
Also, the books shown in the intro are just examples of books. Not that I necessarily endorse them. While I do acknowledge the contribution of New Atheism, I find their overall analysis to be ahistorical and mostly idealist in nature (contrary to the Marxist analysis of similar societal structures).
4:00 - I illustrated the example of the D-P-R-K because that's far more accessible as an example. My views have since changed on the D-P-R-K and, while I do have my reservations about some of their policies, I would refrain from criticizing them along the "free speech" line. I find their policies far less objectionable (in total) when compared to the policies enacted by the so-called "free world".
Комментарии