Sen. Ted Cruz on Defending the Second Amendment and Bill of Rights with Laura Ingraham

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

It's okay for a criminal to try to buy a gun .Waste the time of people waiting in line for a background check.The criminal walks away angry and no investigation is made . What's the point of having a background checks ? How many of the 15, 000 criminals turned away, just went out and stole a gun ? They should fine the ones attempting to purchase guns ! The ones caught with guns after trying to purchase failed should to jail time !

Twgaydos
Автор

They should have arrested all 15, 000, but where are you going to house all of them. It costs a lot; don't we have money problems? Why not fine all of them and take all their guns, if you can. What is the answer? We have too many criminals. Stop abusing the rights of the noncriminal!!!!

Granny
Автор

I think 2016 should bring Cruz/Paul. This is a true match made in heaven and the democrats would pay for the acts they have committed.

hawkdaddy
Автор

As the interview goes, only 44 of 15, 000 were prosecuted for applying to purchase a gun when they were not qualified due to past crime reports/records. In other words, just the fact that they went in and wanted to purchase a gun, they were violating their probation and/or release rules which are likely felonies.

gsuburban
Автор

Background checks are a waste of time too. Why? The government doesn't have that system or technology correctly sifting through the many resources they should not to mention, they don't prosecute those who stand out in those checks. Leave it up to government to make a mess out of it all. Not to mention, there's way too many legal gun owners who own guns long before any of this began so there's millions of them unregistered and without background checks. Think, better or worse 30-40 years ago?

gsuburban
Автор

How is that a loaded question? You said "I sure as hell don't support background checks". Then how else would you stop violent criminals, murderers, rapists, child killers, gang bangers, from legally purchasing firearms? Can you answer that then?

jasonlbutler
Автор

All the States have unconstitutional laws against the 2nd!! I/We have the right to Keep and Bear (any) Arms If I/We choose too and yes that means a Tank, Fighter jet, Rocket launcher any conventional arms that the US military has I/We are allowed to have per the 2nd amendment!!

TexasPrepper
Автор

The RNC and the great state of Texas give you Cruz/Paul. That would put Hillary Clinton on her

hawkdaddy
Автор

Are you serious? You don't think that 85-90 percent of Americans support universal background checks?

jasonlbutler
Автор

I think the LEFT needs to be very worried come 2014!!!! This is BS, we should not be having this debate. It should be about mental health and enforcing the laws ON THE BOOKS

ViseGrip
Автор

I wanna throw up every time I hear Obummer talk.

salvador
Автор

REMEMBER BENGHAZI! Our ambassador deserved better but was

hawkdaddy
Автор

It's already illegal for those people to buy guns. Saying that a murderer can legally buy a weapon is a fallacy. Why don't you learn about the gun laws we have right now before you start debating them.
What do I propose? How about we stop letting violent criminals out on the streets. Tell me again. do you really think gang members and criminals are going to stop and say " I need you to take a background check before I sell you this illegal gun."

Conglo
Автор

So you have no problem with anyone owning a gun? Really? You have no problem with a murderer walking into a gun show and purchasing a gun? Yes/No?

jasonlbutler
Автор

I sure as hell don't support background checks.

Conglo
Автор

Yea I noticed that. When did he magically become a Libertarian? Never even heard anybody suggest that.

LibertyLawHistory
Автор

So, having no background checks at gun shows is okay?

jasonlbutler
Автор

Well if that's not a loaded question then I don't know what is.

Conglo
Автор

I never said you disagree with me therefore you're avoiding the question, no, you are simply avoiding the question. If you don't want to kill criminals in order to keep them off the streets, then what do you purpose we do with convicted criminals? Either you are advocating for 1. Keeping them in jail forever or 2. killing them. Which one is it?

jasonlbutler
Автор

Yes you did! You don't have to say the words "I want to kill criminals" in order to incinuate it. You said that criminals shouldn't be let back on the streets. Okay, so where do they go then? Do they stay in jail forever? Is that what you're saying? You should be a politician! LOL! Not explaining crazy statements and avoiding simple questions. I love it.

jasonlbutler