Stealth Calvinism’s New Brand: 3 Dot Theology

Kevin discusses the new branding for Stealth Calvinism. It is called "3 Dot Theology." It is very sly and deceptive. Christians need to be aware of these sly and subtle tactics.

Or Venmo @kevin-thompson-418
Or CashApp $kevinthompson418


Purchase the Original PowerPoint slide decks used in our other videos here:



Check out our Audio podcasts on iTunes Podcast or Soundcloud:

PLAYLISTS:
8 ‘A’s of Salvation” (pre-requisite salvation considerations before other inferences can be entertained)
“Christian Cognition” (learn about the things that affect data processing other than “the facts”)
“Full Stature Initiative” (follow presentations and group discussions of the Book of Acts)
“Acts 13:48” (videos that address this so-called “Calvinist proof text”)
“Calvinist Infiltration” (videos that address Calvinist infiltration into non-Calvinist churches)


BTF Uses the following Equipment and software to produce videos:
Camera: Sony Handycam FDR-AX53
Microphone: Sennheiser AVX Digital Wireless Mic System with Countryman H60W6TSR H6 Omnidirectional Wireless Headset; Shure SM7B, Rode NT1
Audio: Focusrite Scarlett 2i4
Video Editing Software: Final Cut Pro X,
Video Recording Software: Wirecast by Telestream, Zoom
Visual Aids: MS PowerPoint, Logos Bible Software

[truth]

I count 4 dots! But then again I just watched 1984 last night! Well done Kevin keep up the good work.
For me everyday is "Calvin Whacking Day"!
Truth in love

[laughingmum]

When I asked the pastor, are Calvinism and Arminianism the only options? His answer was yes, and that was the beginning of the end for me. Thank you for your efforts helping believers who are searching for the truth.

[_sojourner]

“Don’t argue for free will.”

That is great advice.

[rp-lopez]

Wow, that correlation between wokeism and calvinism on controlling the language was super on point. I've never noticed that. You can't get any clearer and more accurate than "Non-free free-will" but they'd never use that phrase

[robertajackson]

This video and those associated with the James Ross saga have me wondering, "What is the end game here?" If the movement was successful and every Christian turned to Calvinism, who benefits? Is there some victory attached to this? For whom? What is the reward? Some heavenly posthumous reward for John Calvin? Or is this part of the prophesied end times church apostasy that I've heard so much about my entire life...?

[robynwilliams]

Kevin, my heart breaks for the never ending fight you (and thankfully a few other faithful brothers) fight for the truth against 1: (calvinism) and the many insults against God from those who profess to know Him (NAR etc) but calvinism is so repugnant and I'm thankful I know our heavenly Father (that Paul preached). I'm in New Zealand. I'm pretty sure now that the church (Baptist) I go is (c). 😢 Please know how much I appreciate and love you as a brother in Christ

[beautifulbuds]

You the Best Kevin!!!! Ill never underestimate the fight in should ANY Calvinist...

[Baltic_Hammer]

1:08:25 Dr Ken Wilson is awesome to listen to and his dissertation research utterly destroys the foundation of Calvinism laid down by Augustine. I find it beyond words that nobody in church history in the past 1, 500+ years bothered to read all the ""Church Fathers""writings in chronological order.

Maybe some did but didn't dare to speak out on Augustine plugging pagan Gnosticism determinism into church dogma. We know what Rome and Geneva did to anyone who exposed their evil.

It was shocking to learn a couple things. One/, no "church father" subscribed to determinism until Augustine pulled it out of his old Manichean bag of tricks to beat Pelagius in their argument. I've said for years its more important as a Calvinist to win an argument than to be right. Saw that countless times up close in my life.

Second/ the gnostics use/used the same Bible texts as Calvinists to "prove" their dogma is correct, the One & Only. This blew my mind big time.

When Dr Wilson's dissertation with its documented findings was made public, I could just see people like Mr. James White squirming in their seats. I had hoped it would it the eyes of the public figures of Calvinism. But my realist side said....Nope they will dig in their heels and fight and screech against the proven truth. That's certainly what happened. No matter how much evidence was given to Mr White, he flatly refused to admit he was wrong on anything. People like John MacArthur would never admit they were wrong, because then he'd have to confess leading people to hell for most of his life. Their pride will never permit them to confess they are not only wrong but really really wrong.

[unitedstates]

at 1hr22min mark - why no reference to evanescent grace. "Roughly speaking, God in his good pleasure, actively causes a deception to fall upon some reprobate men, which gives them a fleeting desire to worship him and follow Christ." Ask any calvinist if they believe in the doctrines of (dis)grace and then ask about this. Kills the conversation right away.

[timothyhodges]

The key to making the synthetic element to work is to get the core group to agree. Bayshore is proof. Two women dissenters were eliminated out of the congregation. Excommunicated. Good work Kevin!

[arkrainflood]

EVIL ! God commands christians to speak truth in love, yet calvinists speak lies in greed ( money position power)

[gavinadams]

Great channel, i had no idea they were so deceptive.

[polskigirl]

I would liken Reformed/Calvinism to the movie…..Invasion of the Body Snatchers….

[Paladin-ve]

Thank goodness we’re shielded from these errors in Pentecostal and Methodist churches

[darrennelson]

It's hard not to have free will as an axiom, and I don't think it's a straw man. The Bible assumes it on every page. Any process one employs to come up with other axioms (such as "Scripture is true") requires reason, which is itself a function of free will.

[minorsingingairhead]

Dare2Share is actually a Free Grace ministry. I noticed that Free Gracers often times hold to Calvinistic propositions while explicitly denouncing Calvinism. Ironic.

[dianehelena]

@ 27.52 "...they will frame the discussion that way (Hegelian Dialectic) quickly and avoid any kind of labels such as Calvinism... ...they don't say 'Reformed' necessarily anymore even though that used to be a word that Calvinists used to tie themselves to the Reformation which most people see as an honourable, wonderful thing and don't realize that it was just a Catholic squabble...". Well said.

[alliebahbah]

Can you recommend any of your prior videos Kevin, that touch upon CS Lewis at all?

[ravissary]

Kevin... calvinists didnt invent the concept of libertarian free will.
Its irrational to eschew labels so reflexively instead if fleshing them out reasonably and using them with nuance, specificity and practicality to reflect a functional interaction with The world, scripture, and God.
Libertarian even has subcategories... like PAP and self-causation (not self creation, but origination of a choice within the self as a minimalistic definition, this is popular with molinists).

[jars]

Personally, I’m at a crossroads about this issue, because as I read more and more of the scriptures, I do not see what the Calvinists are talking about.
Having said that, I have close family that hold these beliefs and it sounds to me that the community church I attend, is made up of quite a good number of Calvinists.
The issue for me is this: are they not saved? I don’t mind what they believe in, as long as I stand rooted in the scriptures.
But is this the wrong way to go about it??