Flawed Stem Cell Study And The Problems With Peer Review

The journal Nature retracted the faulty study but says there was nothing its editors could have done to catch the flaws.

Sources:

Image via: Wikimedia Commons / Ryddragyn

[MrGoingtoheaven]

The worst aspect of peer review is when creationists don't send their articles to peer reviewed journals because they know they do not contain the required level of scholarship for publication, they are not published! This is a conspiracy and the fact that  that no proper, scientific peer reviewed journal will publish ill researched, badly written creationist nonsense, especially when they are not sent in for consideration, shows the flaws in the system. We demand that poorly researched, badly written and unsubstantiated diatribes written by people with no qualifications and no understanding of what they are talking about be published and if they are not its not fair!

[TemporalOnline]

Science. It works, even when it is mistaken. Proud of it.

[maninspired]

Almost sounded too good to be true.. Chime the pro life debate again.