2013 Ford Mustang GT vs V6 Mustang 0-60 MPH Mile High Mashup Test

[coryclark]

They should have both been automatic... Neither of these guys can drive worth a damn.

[bugattiss]

I bet most of the people who call these cars slow drive something WAY slower than both of them

[b-better]

Bought an 07 v6 for my first car few weeks ago and I love it

[Kvandy]

2 seconds from 0-60 is an enormous leap in performance at these times, even with the altitude/payload hits.

[tommyt]

My GT Premium rag top w/ auto did it in about 5.1 seconds, but I didn't have 2 fat asses in the car.

[mr.c]

I remember watching this video years ago. I still have my ‘14 GT and I love it. That’s the beauty of the mustang line up. There’s a mustang for everyone!! My fist mustang was a ‘98 V6 5 speed manual and I loved it. I had plenty of power and so much fun. Now with my GT it brings back memories I lived with my V6. They are both awesome cars!! Plus that V6 had more horse power that the previous GT’s!!

[nathanmcdonald]

I really enjoyed watching 2:05 on 0.5 speed lol.

[nanook]

I have a 2014 V6 I also had an Airaid cold air intake installed as well a the Borla catback exhaust to me it sounds GREAT! and it goes fast enough for me...

[oldwortex]

lesson learned - if you can't drive get a V6 automatic, install a shorter rear end and you will beat the GT manual guys at least 3 times out of 4. Both of these guys should be testing tampons for cow's.

[troywingert]

People who own v8s and shit on v6s are just trying to justify spending $10, 000 extra. A v6 will do the job...

[harpella]

These guys get to review cars!? Learn to drive!

[aftermath]

I've seen the 2013 Ford Mustang V6 do just under 6 seconds in other videos and the V8 around 4.3 seconds. For ever day driving, I would stick with the V6 just because it is way better on gas (19 city/31 hwy) and it is still very fast! No point in spending $10k more if you're not going to race it and suffer with 15-18 city/25 hwy.

[soulerflare]

even at altitude of 5280 ft these cars have 353.5 hp and 257 hp . They both need a driver mod.

[sk-tkwh]

I got a v6 just because, it's lighter and overall easier to mod....






nah Hell no I couldn't offered the V8 Hahaha

[LuisRodriguez-slcg]

the v6 is pretty nice. driving it in california at about 75mph highway (flooring it every now and then too), and you still get 27mpg. Good deal.

[TFLcar]

Thanks for the kind comments and yes we got the horsepower wrong.

[andrewchristianson]

8.34 seconds for 0-60mph in the v6? I don't think so. I have the 2014, and it doesn't even take me close to 8 seconds with it just in Drive, maybe a little over 6. I used the Sport (Select) Shift and could've sworn it took me around 6 seconds to get to 80mph. And 6.14 seconds for the 5.0 (GT).. a 412hp car.. what!!?? LOL

[marcschaefer]

8.34 my ass😂... I drive a camaro but I would still root for the Mustangs. They deserve better than these two dudes

[YLLOWBI]

2013 camaro v6 and mustang v6 0-60 in the high 5s... Owned three v8s in my life and never wouldve thought id b comfortable with getting a v6 for a daily.

[timmypstyle]

READ!! they mention elevation. The higher the elevation the more power loss. Generally at 6000ft a turbo car loses about 3% of its power, supercharged -8% and natural aspiration -18%. You guys in mustang GTs who beat say a STI would lose to an STI up here. I used to have a 96 trans am auto and raced a 3000GT vr4 and won, but here I would have been smoked. Btw he beat me to 60 but I passed him around 80 and was 2 cars by 105. My 5.8 clocked 0-60 would be around 7.5...his would go from 5.9 or so to 6.0(turbo). My reg cab shortbed ram hemi 4x4 gets to 60 in 7.9. My friends 12 charger r/t is about 7.0.