Mass defect and binding energy | Nuclear chemistry | Chemistry | Khan Academy

preview_player
Показать описание
Using the mass defect to calculate the energy released when a helium nucleus formed. Introduction to the nuclear strong force.

Chemistry on Khan Academy: Did you know that everything is made out of chemicals? Chemistry is the study of matter: its composition, properties, and reactivity. This material roughly covers a first-year high school or college course, and a good understanding of algebra is helpful.

About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.

For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I disagree with the people who complain about the calculator taking too much time. It's good to see how the calculations are done as it helps with the understanding of it .It also gives you a chance of thinking about what was said and making sense of it in your head.

henrik
Автор

4:29 mass defect
5:51 conversion
10:43 nuclear binding ey

veenapanini
Автор

loving the video, buh the calculator takes tym, it b better if there were Done b4

Rainbow-duln
Автор

Thank you, I been looking for a video like this for probably about an hour now and this finally cleared my confusion

hjalmarlevander
Автор

As many of them are confused regarding electron mass exclusion, the species that is shown up here is a Helium nucleus which was obtained from alpha decay. Hence, it has no electrons in it. Watching the video on types of decay can provide more clarity.

chiramana_
Автор

I love you yar. You really saved my life. It helps me very much in my exams practice. Thank you so much

huzaifasaleem
Автор

This is sooo helpful!
Thanks a lot :)

dhananjaleeelagalla
Автор

This video was so amazingly helpful, thank you!!

WRX_Diaries
Автор

Thank you so much for the great explanation! :)

sruthijayadevan
Автор

Thank you for the explanation, I can now say that calculating the mass defect is more intuitive. There is one question I'd like to ask, if you don't mind. Should the energy which has been released have a "-" sign in front of it? Some textbooks I've read have instructed the reader to do so, while others don't seem to really care.

utopianice
Автор

Learnt a lot from this video, but I have a quick question:
Why is it that the neutrons and protons must lose mass and convert it into energy in order to become a nucleus? Sorry, I'm just starting to dive into all this ^ ^;

yume-eu
Автор

Thank you so much Sir
This is helpful

saharnaseer
Автор

What is the difference between mass defect and mass difference

crazyboy
Автор

In Nuclear fission When the neutron hits the nucleus of u-235 some particle's(either one of proton's or neutron's mass in u-235 nucleus is bieng converted to energy right??)But the question is is it one of proton in u-235 nucleus or one of neutron in u-235 nucleus???

shashankchandra
Автор

This proved that nuclear fusion can create energy in return for a loss of mass from the quarks. I fail to understand (considering nuclear binding energy) why does nuclear fission also create energy? A simple assumption would be that fission would eat up the binding energy, and give none in return.

NixterTheCool
Автор

next video of calculating mass of an object plz

richatiwari
Автор

Is it correct for mass defect to be negative?

zdanmubita
Автор

How would you know the number of protons and neutrons if the only available data is the amu of the element?

imnothingbutastreetcat
Автор

do you not have to worry about electrons??

MrRaisin
Автор

Shouldn't we also need to include electron mass in the predicted?

satrickptar