Julia Mossbridge | Screening for Precognition, Remote Viewing and Micro-Psychokinetic Skills

Mark Boccuzzi, Co-Founder, Windbridge Institute, LLC is a research scientist and innovator at the intersection of science, technology, education, and interactive visual arts. For more than a decade, he has worked to apply these disciplines to the study of consciousness and psi (telepathy, precognition, clairvoyance, and mind-matter interactions).

Marcia Nisam is a Research Assistant at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, an RN with a specialty in Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, COO of medical consulting company, and cofounder of a San Francisco-based dance company.

Adam Crabtree is a member of the Faculty, Centre for Training in Psychotherapy, Toronto. He has written many articles and books relating to the history of animal magnetism, the history of hypnosis, the history of psychotherapy, the origins of psychodynamic psychotherapy in the West, and the history of dissociative disorders.

Recorded at the Society for Scientific Exploration Conference in Broomfield, Colorado 2019.

Special thanks to our Patreon Explorers for providing the support we need to keep our video content freely available online: Dr. CMC Toporow, Kathleen Erickson, Mark Crewson, Mark Urban-Lurain, Roger Nelson, Gene Thomas, and Sandy Wiener.

The SSE provides a forum for original research into cutting edge and unconventional areas. Views and opinions belong only to the speakers, and are not necessarily endorsed by the SSE.

[hardywatkins]

I've had many precognitive dreams. I never considered myself psychic, .. just have insights occasionally. I had a NDE once also but the point of my comment is just to describe how i did remote viewing one time ... namely, by using the format of a shamanic journey to do so.
- This was like fifteen years ago and a woman on 'hipforums', wanted me to do a psychic reading for her so i thought i'd put it to the test. So i had a recording of rattles ( i prefer rattles to drums) and headphones, i do a few ritual preliminaries and i lay down in bed and get all cosy and relaxed and just let the rattles work and let my mind fall on the subject and see what arises, .. So i imagine a place, a bar, a name for that bar, where she spends alot of time. Some people there, two guys, a love interest and a little story.
So i tell her all this the next day and type it all out for her and ask for some feedback, y:know? So all she said was "Wow!", and she didn't post after that.
I never really had the impulse to do that kind of thing again, but i often wonder if any of that journey was true as her response seemed to suggest so. I don't see why not as i seem to have this ability in dreaming, and dreaming and the shamanic journey are very much the same place i've learned, so i just think that maybe using the format of the shamanic journey might be a good way to go about remote viewing and precognition?

[OrphanRed]

This is absolutely fantastic! I'm so inspired by Dr. Mossbridge and delighted to see a more insightful examination of the data, to take into account other biases that affect it, and the problems with clumping. I also loved her analogy of the pistons.. Brilliant altogether. Thank you for making this publicly available.

[NuniqueNewNork]

100% it's real. I scare myself sometimes I mean, if you're willing to send a journalist and detective to do an interview... theres still one guy that might not want to admit the warning I gave him.... BY the way, if you give me a number or email, I'll send you a message when I get the next warnings. But I've adopted the life of a hermit so I don't have to see future death any more. She like Marie Curie, huh... I bet you $5 one of her friends named George discovered accelerrated radioactive decay, and it's been over 100 years, and nobody has finished that work... Yeah.

[diouranke]

this is very possible, but most of us are so beyond it at a certain age because of culture, conditioning etc.

[NotHumant]

This is the age of another extreme from past sorcery. This is something that hard on science mind simply can not accept, tunnel vision and ego. They had forgotten that science is still based on " give us one free miracle and we will explain the rest"

[PerScientiaAdAstra]

...this is all wrong. The very first question on that overhead should be: 'what scientific evidence exists for psy?'