Neil deGrasse Tyson: 'James Webb Telescope Just Detected 900 Trillion Stars DISAPPEARING!

NASA’s $10 billion James Webb Space Telescope has now been in space for little more than two years, but the stunning results it’s already returned are proving its worth every penny.
--------------
COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
EYES 200M don't fully own the material compiled in this video. It belongs to individuals or organizations that deserve respect.

We use under: Copyright disclaimer section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. "fair use" is allowed for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarships and research.

[davidmcgrath]

I heard it all now, the universe is disappearing and their is absolutely nothing we can do about it ! WTF.

[johnclarke]

what is so strange? universe expands faster than light pasess through it, so always loosing sight of stars, not scary at all just amazing

[nmaikowski]

They just added both of these telescopes in the museum here in Wilmington NC. They did an amazing job. So from what everything is telling me.... Everything is living and has a lifespan. What is living that keeps the universe growing?

[geraldfrig]

Stranger than fiction! I'd like to hear MUCH MORE from highly respected astronomers & cosmologists about this topic. Like I Sir Roger Penrose, Brian Greene, and at least at least a dozen others!!

[paulheinrich]

I know a couple "stars" that wouldn't be missed. How can I volunteer them for an experimental disappearing process?

[rezadaneshi]

So equivalent of two thousand galaxies dropped out of our cosmic horizon. Only 46 billion light years left to go

[KeysOnFire]

If the universe is expanding and accelerating then the Hubble Constant is not a fixed rate or Constant, its a variable Constant rate of acceleration. Therefore if the universe is expanding and accelerating beyond our visible horizon we should be able to calculate a given amount of spacetime for a volume of space that has expanded, accelerated, receded, or "disappeared" beyond the visible horizon, that there is no edge of the universe, just a barrier of time and region of space from which light cannot reach our instruments. So we should also be able to calculate expansion for volumes of spacetime we can project or predict that will cross that boundary. Usually the bigger universal question "minus the Big Bang "Theory" remains; "Was the space already there", that the Big Bang did not create "Space" to expand into. Might seem odd that science is operating basically from the same premise as religion, the belief in a "first light" of the universe. That a void of space pre-existed, space which already or inherently held the constitution or ingredients for the creation of matter and the basic elements throughout its fabric, we seem to think that process began 13.8 billion years ago, but that timeline is out of date given the volumes of space that can expand and accelerate beyond our radar. Are voids the limitations for a universe or just the filamentary reshaping of galactic clusters and superclusters, possibly through which they traversed? Unless we can discover extremely high molecular densities of dark matter or that voids are massive clouds where the laws of gravity do not apply, we have not yet detected spectral elements from these voids and we do not have a shaping of distances that would indicate such voids belonged to or were created between other universes, simply because the voids are too close.

[axebearer]

It is kinda terrifying to consider that there's a non-zero chance that these stars disappeared because someone intentionally disappeared them.
That would be... very bad.

[rafehr]

TIME. Man will never travel too other Galaxy's or even Mars. The human body comes apart long term in space.

[ashleyobrien]

"Who ordered that?" is supposed to be about sub atomic particles not celestial galactic stuff....

[koriw]

"The good thing about Science is that it’s true, whether or not you believe in it."

[Toecutter]

I thought Brain Cox was thick but this bloke takes the biscuits

[sana-cmoc]

Cool video. This seems to further suggest we are living in a simulation due to the unknown / unmeasurable nature of dark energy.

[alanhamilton]

The whole red shift theory of distance is far from proven. It’s annoying how these commentators talk theory as if it’s a fact.

[sunking]

Actually...I calculated closer to 897.36 trillion stars. 900 is way too many!

[phonggt]

Total clickbait title. Why put Neil deGrasse on the title when he barely said anything.

[gailcastles]

If the universe is expanding, aren’t we moving too?

[koriw]

Just because stars have moved outside of the *observable* universe does not mean that they went *anywhere.* They are simply too far away for their light to reach us. This does not imply dastardly deeds or fake science, it is merely a provable scientific datum.

[martineastburn]

Hubble to Webb to (the next bigger, bigger one ) yes there is a larger one in the final stages to go up and outclass Webb. It will help prove what Webb sees and see much better and much more. Going to be interesting Decade. What happened to "GC the Galactic center".

[EvordRiccie]

Comparation between samsung and iphone camera