Following Philo by P.J. Gott and Logan Licht: In Search Of The Men Called Jesus

preview_player
Показать описание
"Jesus the Nazarean"? Or "Jesus of Nazareth"? Mythological or historical? In this episode of "Following Philo," Gott and Licht offer abundant evidence, available but unrecognized for nearly two thousand years: "Jesus," like "Superman," is mythological...however, like George Reeves, Christopher Reeve, Henry Cavill, and thirteen other men called "Superman," the actors who played the role of "Jesus" in annual festivals were living, breathing men. They were well known in Jerusalem and Rome, and the writers, directors, and producers are among the most recognized men and women in history.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Do not unto others as you would not have them do unto you.

stephencartwright
Автор

Finally saw it all. Excellent, will have to see it again. Pasted in one of my Forums on the Flavians, where there are some good scholars.

VTOLmad
Автор

I went to Duomo in Como and noticed that there where numerous parts of this amazing edifice that was interfered with to create an incorrect story,

stephencartwright
Автор

Are you aware the Pisos-Flavius family of Rome penned the gospels, Book of Acts, Romans, and Book of Revelation (which btw, I believe was taken partially from the "Essene Book of Revelation")? Their individual names are numerologically encoded in the texts, I recorded what a scholar found regarding this. This may also be the reason why certain words such as "Nazareth" do not appear in the hebrew. The gospels were not written by the disciples, at least the gospels in the KJV bible. At best, they were reworked/edited, as they contain lies and deceptions regarding Jesus' (Issa's) teachings. This is proven by a set of manuscripts found near Jerusalem by Edward "Billy" Meier in 1963. These manuscripts show that Judas was not Jesus' betrayer, but the son of Simeon the High Priest, "Juda Ihariot". The plot was to use him since he had a similar name, as his betrayer, in an attempt to make people see the disciples as being divided amongst themselves. It also relates many statement Christ made which were purposely "mistranslated". It is a staggering find, and one Jesus himself prophesied about. Many of the books in the OT are of rather mysterious origin as well, there is something in play that we are largely unaware of. They are all singularly relating a spiritual concept or "wisdom teaching". I think it relates to the fact we're meant to be able to combat the "serpentine mind" (be wise as serpents, harmless as doves).

davidm
Автор

what is the piano music playing in beginning please?

rotynrotyn
Автор

Ever wonder why each of the different "gnostics", of a type, each have the same traumatic developmental and psychological backgrounds? There is nothing transcendental or mystical about Gnosticism, birds of the same temporal, conditional, circumstances, and causation, subliminally recognize, and flock together, like birds of a feather...the same way the automaton and memebots of every other ideology flock together. Group think in a sad sad denial of individualization, and Liberation.

Mortaryan
Автор

The whole Christian narrative's timeline is questionable. There is a falsehood in all history books on the subject. It would appear that as much as a thousand years has been added. Tartary, Khumry, Samurai have been omitted, even the word Khumry is not recognised. All these people were Christian.

stephencartwright
welcome to shbcf.ru