The REAL Reason Terrence Howard Says 1x1=2

Terrence Howard, is asserting that 1 x 1 equals 2. Sounds insane, right? Or could he be onto something revolutionary? Terrence Howard has been going viral lately after his appearance on the Joe Rogan show. This sparked a wildfire of discussion on the internet, with many people, including Neil deGrasse Tyson, responding and talking about it.

Terrence uses mathematical laws to justify his claim, but do these laws actually support him? He also believes that civilizations were tricked thousands of years ago to misunderstand these concepts and there’s been a global conspiracy to keep humanity in the dark.

So, does 1 x 1 actually equal 2? Is Terrence Howard a mastermind or out of his mind? Whether you think he's a genius or completely off his rocker, you're about to find out what this really means.

More ways to support:

Follow Morgue:

#TerrenceHoward #JoeRogan #NeilDeGrasseTyson #Mathematics #ViralDiscussion #GlobalConspiracy #MathematicalLaws #MultiplicationDebate #Terryology #AncientCivilizations #Annunaki #AleisterCrowley #OccultSymbols #Numerology #NewAgeThinking #Metarationalism #HigherConsciousness #Metaphysics #RationalThinking #MysticalInsights #neogenian #HiddenKnowledge #TrueNatureOfReality

[zaneba]

Who cares what Terrance Howard says not the first insane celebrity and not the last either smh

[TheGStudio]

The catch was that 2 physical items are the reality drawing from a theoretical rule of 1.
For example, if the ad sale would have actually meant, buy 1 and get one for free, but the merchant will only allow you to leave with only 1.
This would prove what the system is doing to the minds that have been taught the basic multiplication that eliminates the physical values of multiple groups.
Remember this, most of us have been taught that math is a problem not a solution.
All of math's problems are actually exposed to us in the unfoldment of nature.
Most people are taking those answers for granted 🤔?

[purplehaze]

He can provide zero evidence to back up his backward claims, and you talk so much waffle it makes your channel very uninteresting

[mixey]

"Terrence Howard spend five decades contemplating the subject in 2017 when he was 48 years old. He started thinking about this when he was -2"
That had me rolling on the floor with laughter

[heartofthunder]

Actually the 1 times 1 should equal 2, because times is doubling it self by the number, there should be an exception for 2 through the rest of the numbers.

[K-Belgianbros]

Seems odd the way in which you attacked this one. Almost like you were told too. Howard is not going to be right about everything. But you just showed your agenda I believe.

[kaleef_sabali_i_am]

Intelligence Goes Far Beyond Logic, Reason, Intellect Nd Rationality°

European Asili Is Restricted Nd Limited In It's Ability To Gather From All P.O.V's Of Truth°

[HermanoKanlaon]

Those brilliant minds in the past are considered crazy and now were regarded as genius and correct. Let's see this equation after decades..

[Mysticalturkey]

So said two years ago you practice Hyperianism now you're neogenion? What's the difference?

[vicky-ednc]

1x1=2 is a classic war between left brain and right brain. Those in the middle just know everything is true and untrue at the same time.

[bonnarlunda]

I'm not good at maths, and this whole conversation makes my head hurt, BUT... Science don't evolve if we stick to old beliefs, defending them like religion. For those who dare take Terrence's ideas into consideration and think deeply about them before dismissing them as bonkers within the current system and understanding, will have done good groundwork. There's a tremendous difference between "I know this because my teacher told me so" and "I know this because I've tested the idea and were able to dismiss all other suggested solutions as false". That is in essence, the difference between religion and science.

[Davelove.]

If we can teach a biological man isn't a man and a biological woman isn't a woman, you can teach 1×1=2.

[kurtpoulsen]

The earth is actually flat in present. (On surface of earth). And the earth is also a sphere in future. (From space). Reason is time is relative.

[iamtheangeloflight]

Complementing the idea around Crowley, I do think he said that 0 equals 2 because the number 0 stays right in the middle of an "infinite numeric line" dividing it in two parts (negative and positive)

[afreakhanh]

wait a sec...

2x5 means a group of things multiplied by a number, in this case by 2, so that we could say something like, a group of 5 apples multiplied by 2 equals 10 apples.
2x5=10


But something is missing. Where is the mention of the group gone now? We should have said something like:
, ,A group of 5 apples multiplied by 2 equals a group of 10 apples."


Maybe that could be written like this:
2x[5]=[10]

why? because
2x5 = 2x5
and
2x[5] = 2x[5]

or

2x[5] = [10]

but

2x5 =/= 10

[ganian]

All i can say is terrence is next level genius. Here is a clue to what he is saying. When you say 1 x 1 it is foolishness because you are mixing apples with bananas. If i say i have 2 apples multiplied by 1 the number 1 is not a number. It represents a quantity. That quantity is 2. So a better way to say it is 2 x 2 quants. Now we are not mixing apples and bananas. 2x2q = 4 apples. So in this case a quant Is 2. So when you say 2×2 you really should be saying 2xq. When you say 1x1 you should be saying 1xq. In both these case the value of q depends on what you are multiplying with. We should not be saying 1 x 1. Or 2x3 . That is foolishness. It is 1 times quantity and 2 times 3quantities. You should not introduce another number to the equation. It is 1 x quantity. Because that is equal to 1. But 1x1 =2 because you now have 2 numbers there. Our maths is primitive because it gives you the same answer if you say 1x2 or 2x1 . That makes no sense. You should not get the same answer. There should be one truth. And that one truth is that 2 times quantity is 2 . This represents 2x1 in our backward math. In terrence's math 2x6 is 2 times 3quantities. The quantities will always be 3. In our broken math you can change the quantity to 2 which would require you to change the other number to a 3. Which is not the same thing. 2x3 is not the same as 3x2. Think about it

[robertedward]

I just wanted to say that asking people to like your video now before it even starts is like asking someone to give your movie a great review before watching it.

[NihilIslands]

Tell bankers you want your dollars multiplied one times and expect double sum

[kobalt]

I liked a lot of what T Howard said in the JR interview, but the 1x1+ 2 thing just confused me and made no sense. The way you explained it with "grouping" is absolutely wonderful Morgue, thank you so much.

[ablackconception]

Man. . You come really close to worrying me frequently. . I'm glad you took the quasi-logical road. . .
I wanted Terrance to level out so bad. Really felt like he was onto something, just needed to acknowledge his own mistakes to progress further in his hypothesis. Unfortunately, that's yet to happen. He's literally smoking the sheetrock right now