Are John and Patsy Ramsey Guilty? Body Language Analysis

The tragic case of JonBenet Ramsey remains unsolved and cold. Throughout its history, myriads of accusations, lies, and mishandling have occurred. Faulty DNA evidence, unreliable witnesses & confessions, tampered evidence, and more have plagued the investigation process from the beginning. Many people have strong feelings about who the culprit(s) might be, but everyone wants justice for JonBenet. This is my nonverbal/body language analysis of the parents involved in the case.

INTRO/OUTRO MUSIC BY AMARIA:
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported — CC BY 3.0
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

[AlbinoNugget]

What stood out to me was also verbiage. “I did not kill THAT child.” You mean MY child…

[kikilynn]

Why would any kidnapper wait to get to the scene of the crime to write the ransom letter, then make it over two pages long? Then kill the child instead of kidnapping her, but still leave an incriminating letter behind??? The only thing that makes any sense is that someone in the family did this.

[consciousmachine]

IMAGINE BODYCAM FOOTAGE OF THE MORNING AT THE RAMSEYS!?!?! 😮

[CassieIlten]

This one breaks my heart. They all failed that child. ❤❤❤

[Emy]

I can bet that John and Burke thought that the Netflix documentary was going to settle the suspicion, and eliminate them, but the documentary OPENED a lot more information against the Ramsey's.

[sadderthanyou]

Patsy wrote the note - beyond ANY doubt. Not only it was her handwriting, but also the note was written exactly the way she talked. Pompous, repetitive, pseudo-dramatic, cheap movie-like.

If Patsy covered up the crime, then it could only be for herself or someone in the family.

[MsBackstager]

JR speaks like a true businessman at a meeting.

[dennistrull]

They spoke with police only when forced to.

[IncredibleMomentsbestof]

I bet John and Burke thought that the Netflix documentary would clear up the doubts and put them to rest, but instead, the documentary has uncovered even more information that works against the Ramsey family.

[MacSwan]

I never imagined that it was the family but after all these years and being older and wiser and revisiting the case, I don’t think there is any question that the family is involved and covered up from the start. It’s one of the most hideous cases I’ve ever seen on all levels.

[infnbynd]

Basically what I got from this video is that we don't know shit about body language. Anything can mean anything at this point. All I have to say is that, if that intruder wanted money, they would've put a gun to JonBennet's head, woke up the parents, and ransomed the money that way. The family is very suspect.

[jamieh]

why leave a ransom note but don't take JB with you ? dead or alive. nobody ever called to get the ransom, then why leave the note ? you leave the note with the intention of calling to collect the ransom, but what, you hope the family dont find JB in the house before you call for the ransom ? if an intruders motive was to assault JB but not kill her, and killed her by accident or to kill her anyway or both they wouldn't leave a ransom note to cover it up, they would just leave, if the motive was ransom why didn't intruder take the body with them ? an intruder and then leaving a ransom note makes zero sense...

[emiliadavis]

Im seeing Patsys tears starting to form and looking down after John Ramsey saying he would want the worst punishment for the perpetrator, i get the feeling that Patsy is envisioning who committed it and it would be heartbreaking for that to happen to ONE OF THEM, AND SHE MAY BE ENVISIONING BURKE AND JOHN.

[Janna-br]

He's wrong about the whole lawyer thing. People, you should ALWAYS lawyer up, especially if you are innocent. Do not cooperate with the police. Too many people have been framed, or had evidence planted. Never give the police anything without your lawyer approving it first. That's just smart, and their lawyer friend was absolutely right to advise them to seek representation.

[AudreyGarcia-iwtm]

Just like in Chris Watt's case, Patsy says, "I didn't hurt (that) child. Chris says, "i didn't hurt (those) girls. Wouldn't you say my daughter and wouldn't you say my girls? Would a person say i loved that child! Does it mean in an analysis that bc your child is no longer living, so you stopped loving that departed child or person bc you instead said i loved, in past tense, then you are guilty of murder? If a family member passes away by natural causes, do you tell ppl i loved, my mother, or do you say I love my mother and always will? I understand that word usage is important, but not always do ppl, use words correctly when speaking. As i may or don't know myself. Here, when John is saying he would like the perpetrator to be punished to the fullest extent of the law, Patsy starts tearing up. Shouldn't her response have been in agreement with John, with a resounding, yes! It appears she has more of an emotion towards, Oh My God No!

[mrscch]

They were definitely involved. How it transpired - I hope we will get that closure. If you are not guilty in any way, why hire two separate attorneys? Why not cooperate to the full extent? Without wasting a second. That is not the way innocent people behave...

[danielsantiagourtado]

Thanks For this! All your hardwork is always appreciated

[foxtail]

Good morning, Mr. Observe!! Thank you for another video!!❤

[spiderlady]

I have no idea who took the life of a sweet child - but I do have a big problem with parents dressing a small child up as an adult and then teaching her how to perform like a sexy adult....NO! do not do Peace.

[phataton]

John’s face when Patsy says “two people who know”