Ideology vs Power Which One Reigns Supreme?

preview_player
Показать описание


Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is the true final form of Gen X ideology.

sniper
Автор

When they talk about an 'orderly transition of power' they mean making sure that power remains in the hands of the same group.

Venant
Автор

"Violence is the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived"

Daimo
Автор

"Man is not a rational animal; he is a rationalizing animal.”
Robert A. Heinlein, Assignment in Eternity

thekid
Автор

A big flaw in AAs arguments is each of the leaders he uses as examples didn't attain power by themselves. They did so because they had a following who believed in the ideology or cause said leader promoted.

robertmacdonaldch
Автор

Power cannot be created or destroyed. It can only pass from one group to another.

RichieBiesty
Автор

You can run but you can't hide from the Irish Candyman Keith

kentandersen
Автор

This reads like suicide note of nrx movement

mikemironov
Автор

10:32 Liberalism still too powerful over AA when he says "parliamentary" where it reads "paramilitary".

QuiQuaeQuae
Автор

The more accurate take, AA, is that power + ideology shapes the world around you. You can have an ideology but without power it is useless. And it is impossible to have power without an ideology.

bobhenderson
Автор

Power for what end? If it’s not to order human life to truth, goodness and beauty, how does it serve us?

JustineBrownsBookshelf
Автор

More specifically, BS matters in that it sways the herd and allows those in power to enjoy legitimacy. This is why they will say anything (the nature of BS) and do what they do.

evelynn
Автор

13:00 "clear them out" negative vision is judgment made possible by our
morality and ideology. If it was simply about power, you go play the game and be part of the current ruling elite

robertmacdonaldch
Автор

"A leader is at his best when he doesn't bathe for fifteen years."

- James I & VI

malicant
Автор

Given that AA isn't in power we can safely ignore the ideology put forth in this segment. But if he were in power then, as evidenced by this segment, it really wouldn't matter what his ideology was as it would justify his position in power regardless of its content.

robanybody
Автор

So you are just going to double down on the critique that you and the NRX circle purport to stand for 'tradition' while actually just promoting cynical and nihilistic realpolitik (power for the sake of power), basically no different from the current 'elites' ? I suppose this means you moved on from Evola, no ?

UltraRadCentrist
Автор

I have always said that the details would come in time. Haggling about them creates purity spirals and infighting in which we simply don't have the "luxury" of partaking at this point. The main thing now is liberating ourselves from the current global hegemony, which seems to be quite set on purging us from existence.

SonoftheAllfather
Автор

Claiming because ideologies do change or adjust and therefore they are not primary driver is just a strawman. No one is claiming ideologies are static. Even ones who believe in objective morality like Christianity so not claim this

robertmacdonaldch
Автор

This is the best book advert I've seen in a while.

stumbling
Автор

Any man who has attained, served his time and walked away because of his ideological convictions disproves this

robertmacdonaldch