epsilon-N definition for a limit at infinity (introduction & how to write the proof)

preview_player
Показать описание
I will introduce the epsilon-N definition of a limit and will also show you how to write a rigorous proof for a limit as x goes to infinity. I will help you understand the definition by using a specific epsilon value, graphs of the function, and the line y=L-epsilon, and solving for a corresponding N. And remember "given, choose, suppose, and check".
#calculus #math #maths #college #blackpenredpen

0:00 I will help you understand the εN definition for a finite limit at infinity
0:19 the 4 main cases of a rigorous definition of a limit
2:24 the εN definition
4:14 how to easily write a rigorous limit proof
11:32 an actual example with ε=0.02 and find a N

#calculus #blackpenredpen #realanalysis #math #college

----------------------------------------
AP-IP Ben Delo Marcelo Silva Ehud Ezra 3blue1brown Joseph DeStefano
Mark Mann Philippe Zivan Sussholz AlkanKondo89 Adam Quentin Colley
Gary Tugan Stephen Stofka Alex Dodge Gary Huntress Alison Hansel
Delton Ding Klemens Christopher Ursich buda Vincent Poirier Toma Kolev
Tibees Bob Maxell A.B.C Cristian Navarro Jan Bormans Galios Theorist
Robert Sundling Stuart Wurtman Nick S William O'Corrigan Ron Jensen
Patapom Daniel Kahn Lea Denise James Steven Ridgway Jason Bucata
Mirko Schultz xeioex Jean-Manuel Izaret Jason Clement robert huff
Julian Moik Hiu Fung Lam Ronald Bryant Jan Řehák Robert Toltowicz
Angel Marchev, Jr. Antonio Luiz Brandao SquadriWilliam Laderer Natasha Caron Yevonnael Andrew Angel Marchev Sam Padilla ScienceBro Ryan Bingham
Papa Fassi Hoang Nguyen Arun Iyengar Michael Miller Sandun Panthangi
Skorj Olafsen Riley Faison Rolf Waefler Andrew Jack Ingham P Dwag Jason Kevin Davis Franco Tejero Klasseh Khornate Richard Payne Witek Mozga Brandon Smith Jan Lukas Kiermeyer Ralph Sato Kischel Nair Carsten Milkau Keith Kevelson Christoph Hipp Witness Forest Roberts Abd-alijaleel Laraki Anthony Bruent-Bessette Samuel Gronwold Tyler Bennett christopher careta Troy R Katy Lap C Niltiac, Stealer of Souls Jon Daivd R meh Tom Noa Overloop Jude Khine R3factor. Jasmine Soni L wan na Marcelo Silva Samuel N Anthony Rogers Mark Madsen Robert Da Costa Nathan Kean Timothy Raymond Gregory Henzie Lauren Danielle Nadia Rahman Evangline McDonald Yuval Blatt Zahra Parhoun Hassan Alashoor Kaakaopuupod bbaa Joash Hall Andr3w11235 Cadentato Joe Wisniewski Eric Maximilian Mecke
----------------------------------------
Thank you all!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This was my absolute worst nightmare while taking Modern Analysis in college! But many thanks for walking us thru the steps of how this proof came to be.

scottleung
Автор

This is just what I studied for an upcoming exam, great to refresh my memory. Thanks 🙏

shiftsync
Автор

you just explained this so well, ive watched so many videos but yours made me clearly understand this. Thankyou so much!!!

radkiller
Автор

Thank you for making this demonstration waaay easier than what I learnt in school. Time to flex it on my teachers 😜

yassinelaouadi
Автор

First time I understand. Great explanation. Thanks

haasjeoverkonijn
Автор

As an engineer working on engineering precision mathematics we find the x equivalent in like time measurements all the time when 2x + 1 approximates to 2x with no significant error in precision. 3x + 4 would need a larger x to equal the same low error approximation as 2x + 1 approximate 2x replaced as 3x + 4 approximately is 3x for x >> 1 for large x. For example, x = 10^4 then the function approximates to 2x/(3x) or x in numerator and x in denominator show we are so close to 2/3 no matter if you have a ripple 1 in the numerator and a ripple 4 in the denominator compared to the 2x value / 3x value ... Not the 2 value / 3 value limit mistake in thinking.

lawrencejelsma
Автор

For epsilon-delta proofs, when speaking through the proof out-loud, it becomes way more obvious for the student if the speaker says not just “for all epsilon greater than zero, …”, but “for all epsilon, no matter how small you decide to choose it, …” - i.e. emphasizing that our intent is to “make” epsilon “smaller and smaller”.

Also “given arbitrary epsilon greater than zero” -> “given arbitrary small epsilon greater than zero”.

dmitrybak
Автор

Good that you gave this video I'm about to start limits in my calc course

varun
Автор

Thank you so much these videos save my life. But do you have a video on if there's an M to find instead of an N?

noonstar
Автор

Could you do a video on how to do the proof backwards/both ways?

helphowdoinputusername
Автор

My teacher gave us some simple limit proof qns in my proofs class when teaching us proof by construction. And this was one of them.

Quick question, if we wanted to prove a limit as x—>-inf, do we just change to N<0 and x<N?

Ninja
Автор

Damn, I appreciate your videos even more given my professor couldn't explain it properly in 3 hours.

nonentity
Автор

Man, you bring out the inner math genius in me, and I'm 62. I follow your logic perfectly

basilbrush
Автор

I have seen an example where the δ chosen was greater than ε. I was wondering would it not throw δ outside the ε window.
Can the chosen δ ever be greater than ε?
Thank u

WritersDigest-bf
Автор

is it necessary to speify the domain of N? like N is s subset of Real numbers when we complete the proof?

abhinnkaushik
Автор

Lovely video, though I would like to point out a correction that for epsilon-N it should be stated as a defined sequence lets say a_n, so rather a set of a sequence than as you said a function:) But both work fine I guess! Ty for the videos!

teddyp
Автор

Hi, what do you do if you have a minus sign in the denominator, so you can't get rid of the absolute value??

Shaan_Suri
Автор

hey blackpenredpen, can you solve

x = i^x

as in, an infinite power tower of i's.

thebestchemicalelement
Автор

I asked myself what the limit of (1+1/x)^(1/x) when x goes to infinity.
I think it goes to 1 but I don't have a way to show it and when I asked Wolfram Aloha it says 1 but the Step-by-step solution kinda goes like e^(0/infinity) equals 1, which it say is the solution.

Can someone help me?

ziro
Автор

Do you have to use the max?
What’s wrong with N being negative?

Happy_Abe