Panic in the Cosmos - Rewriting Cosmic History Beyond the Big Bang Theory - Episode 3

This YouTube video discusses the recent discovery of unexpected galaxies by the James Webb Space Telescope and the implications for our understanding of the origins and evolution of the universe. The video explores the challenges that the discovery poses to the prevailing Big Bang theory and introduces the alternative theory of the Big Bounce, which suggests that the universe has gone through cycles of expansion and contraction. The video examines the advantages and criticisms of the Big Bounce theory and explores how it may be able to address some of the problems that the Big Bang theory struggles with. Overall, this thought-provoking video invites viewers to contemplate the mysteries of the universe and the fascinating theories that scientists are developing to explain it.

Best Telescopes for beginners:
Celestron 70mm Travel Scope

Celestron 114LCM Computerized Newtonian Telescope

Celestron – StarSense Explorer LT 80AZ

Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:

Follow us

Join this channel to get access to these perks:

#NSN #NASA #Astronomy #NobodyExpectedThem #Galaxies #JamesWebbSpaceTelescope #RedStars #EarlyUniverse #BigBang #CosmicHistory #ScientificAgreement #Flaws #NewData #BigBangHypothesis #Physicists #Astronomers #Creationists #CompetingTheories #BigBounce #HubbleLaw #Expansion #Contraction #CyclicalPattern #Inflation #HorizonProblem #Handwaving #UniverseBehavior #AlternativeSolutions #AncientGalaxies

[miguelangelcollazo]

I am amazed not by the fact that we are finding these new galaxies that don’t fit our current understanding of the universe, but by the fact that we built a contraption that made it possible to find them!

[stewartbonner]

there is not a 'panic'. there is a new thing to understand. 'excitement' is the thing.

[rbilleaud]

I'm no cosmologist, but couldn't it just be that the universe is far older than we imagined. We measure the age of the universe based on the cosmic horizon, but we just don't know what lies beyond that. It may expand FAR beyond what we see and therefore could be much older than we suspect.

[ssssssssssss]

That's why I like Brian Greene. Work with the best theories we currently have, but never stop challenging the status quo.

[beamoscrilla]

“Best measurements we have” I have always wondered how in the world they can measure these galaxies. I asked my astronomy teacher I. 97, “ how can we see these galaxies so far away but can’t see the nearest star system?” He tried to make me look dumb. He said, “ it’s obvious, class???” No one answered. Then he said, “because they’re so big!” Even that answer still doesn’t make sense to me.

[jameswood]

I think Fred Hoyle was right We do live in a steady state Universe. The expanding Universe theory won that argument because they misinterpreted the data. The Doppler shift is cause by the fact that no two galaxies were created at the same time. What is WEIRD IS that I think I sent this theory, In a different form to Fred Hoyle and Isaac Asimov in a letter sent through the publisher of a pocket Astronomy book way back in the Mid-1960's. It was called The Theory Of the Accelerating Universe.
Reason: 1) There was no Big Bang. 2) The Universe isn't expanding. It is Accelerating. 3) Galaxies are two discs of stars that are magnetically attracted to one another but can never touch because they consist of opposite kinds of matter, (Our type of matter and its opposite, Antimatter. 4) the result is a Gravity Reaction which moves the Galaxy through space. 5) Because E=MC squared, " Einstein, " once a Galaxy started moving, no matter the direction, it would continue to accelerate forever. 6) Because Galaxies are each created separately and at different times and places in space, a galaxy Would eventually pass Younger Galaxies that had been born in front of it, but it could never catch up to older Galaxies That might be out in front of it. They would always be accelerating at a faster rate of speed. So that if you ASSUMED The Universe was created all at once, which I don't believe it was, It would appear that the Universe was expanding, when it isn't. The Doppler effect is the observable result of each galaxy finding its proper place in the Universe: The time when IT ALONE was came into being; THAT and Einstein's E=MC squared. 7) Because we exist within the boundaries of ONE LIGHT-SPEED we can not see all the other Universes stacked one on top of the other like the pages of a book. Nor do we know whether the book is thick or thin or what page it is in it that our universe inhabits.

[michaelccopelandsr]

It's all about TIME, people!
Time is fascinating. I worked the subway stations for nearly 10 years. From one end of the city to the other. Every so often I would notice the city would be saying that, "Today just flew by" or "The day was just dragging along."  How can an entire city, never having contact with each other until the subway, complain about the same time paradox unless it was effected by it. Maybe a time distorted bubble the earth passes through in its revolution around the sun. Maybe random waves of time distortion hitting the earth? Maybe they're randomly given off by the sun. Maybe they're from outside our Terran system and reach us in intervals. ???? Ti-i-i-ime, is on my side. Yes, it is!

[craigy]

The trouble with the big bang theory is that it starts with a quote from a primitive text, "in the beginning". Infinity has no beginning and no end. Space time is a wave that we can only see a microscopic part of. Some parts will expand while others contract.

[stevecrabtree]

What is really amazing is how people believe that a human like ourself is put into a position that people actually believe they know how and why the universe is here and who created it.Thats amazes me more than anything!

[Andreus]

I really like Brian Greene’s speculation on the question of what could be the real nature of the universe or universes. He is so open to so many options, and therein might be the answers.

[DoreenBellDotan]

I don't understand some people's compulsion to come up with theories about what we can't possibly understand, only to become disoriented when we see we're wrong. Just observe it in awe and enjoy.

[coventrypunx]

Which direction does the telescope look to see the edge or the centre of the universe

[demolicous]

The Panic! paper title is not meant to taken as literal panic. It’s a play on words in relation to the band Panic! At The Disco

[recondrone]

My unscientific mind tells me the Universe is much older and bigger than we thought with these deep field images from the Webb scope. We are still seeing the Galaxy formation age even at the 13.6 billion light years distance . We expected to see a very young Universe at the age of about 500 hundred million years old where some of the first stars begin to formed. Instead we find massive fully evolved Galaxies. Maybe the universe is 20, 30, 40 billion years old.

[stephenbesley]

It's always been a question of mine since I learned about the big bang model is, if it happened once did it happen many times? I know we are limited by what we can see but the thought that everything there is was the result of a unique, one off event seems absurd in a cosmos where events happen many times.

[jean-pierredevent]

Perhaps the universe expands "into itself" and there is a special curving at "the edge" so that we see galaxies from the opposite direction and we could even see the back of our head in theory. An old idea too, no doubt.

[warren]

There is but one unending universe. That is the universe of eternal advertisements.

[calvinsmith]

Here's a theory.... People think on such a small scale based on their visual capability at any given time. It wasn't long ago that people thought that the milky way was the universe until another galaxy was obsevered when we could see further. The big bang was one of many that happened and continue to happen. Some stars collapse in on themselves and create a black hole. Space time is elastic, the collapsed star is heavy and brings in more matter which expands the black hole because the dense matter at the bottom of the black hole becomes heavier and more compact the more matter is drawn in. Eventually the matter ( call it a singularity, though a singularity wouldn't gain mass from extra matter so I think of it more as a single super densely packed participle or single mass) reaches a weight that breaks through space time. Like a worm hole, the bottom of the black hole has pushed itself to a different part of the universe and the dense matter particle pushes itself through and explodes. The matter then explodes out and creates what we think as the big bang. Space time waves ripple out and push the other ' universes' ( if that's what you want to call them. I prefer to think of the current definition of a universe as basically what we think of now as a galaxy) out. It's a bit like boats on water, most of the time the universes get pushed out on the crests, it really depends how close the big bang is to the already present universe or some essentially bob and remain where they are. Why does the particle explode when it pushes through, could be an insanely hot super dense particle hitting sudden freezing cold space that super cools the exterior of particle that makes it brittle and it looses it's exterior structural integrity. The initial existence of the super dense particle also bends down space time immediately but like a dropping an exploding stone into a pool or onto a trampoline, there is an initial cavity that springs back further increasing the force of the explosion and ejecting matter. None of this theory breaks already existing laws of physics but does explain what the ' universe' explodes into and that the true universe is a lot older than 13.8 billion years old and is significantly bigger than what we currently think as the universe. Our universe is basically a big galaxy, one among many. As for dark matter and matter, there could be a formation of either or both when the universe is in it's ultra compact state. I predict that as we see further, there's going to be things that are more than 13.8 billion years old because they were already there as a result of their own big bang. The real question is what programming is in each particle and what part does that play with particles coming together. Do they have their own type of dna or programming to form into objects once they are again released from that compacted state at the time of the big bang.

[JS-ptvc]

Scientist think they already know everything but when it comes right down to it they haven't even scratched the surface of what they don't know . . They should be excited at this finding not defending their wrong theory 😏

[esoteric]

the title of that paper (Panic! at the discs) was meant to be a play on words from the band, panic! at the disco. but yeah this throws a huge wrench into many long held beliefs. in the past when strongly respected theories such as an universal gravitational constant was threatened, scientists just created invisible stuff to account for the abnormally strong gravitational effects in seemingly empty space. then when cosmic inflation was called into question another invisible thing we now call dark energy was introduced. so far the invisible stuff scientists have created make up 96% of the universe. if they have to come up with another invisible thing to account for these anomalous findings our observable universe will likely dip into the sub 1% area with over 99% being invisible stuff.