Weird & Creepy Doll Lines! PART TWO!

preview_player
Показать описание
This video is made for ADULT doll collectors and gift givers. Viewer discretion is advised.

Follow me on INSTAGRAM - @beautyinsideabox

Follow me on TikTok - @JoeysDollBox

Thanks for watching! Please let me know what you think of the dolls in the comments!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Little Miss No Name is extremely collectible and expensive. Those and the Sad Eyes ones were based on the huge craze for the Big Eyes paintings of Margaret Keane. She was everywhere in the late 50s and 60s-- prints, dolls, sculptures, puzzles, etc. People loved her sad, hungry, lonely, neglected, poverty-stricken children, dogs and cats. A dozen other painters stole her style too, and made a fortune.

magdlynstrouble
Автор

the sad looking dolls from the 70s remind me of Margaret Keane paintings, her work was popular during that time

foxglove
Автор

"Dusty" seems like an automatically doomed doll name lol, like it's destined to stay on the shelves

ckind
Автор

I have an odd soft spot for Little Miss No Name. And I'd never seen Susie Sad-Eyes before, but now I'd actually love to own one. The latter definitely seem to have been inspired by the art of Margaret Keane, whom I love

kittymae
Автор

Shocked the crying doll was sold. If I was a parent I’d be like, “no honey this one stays here.” Lol

Blake
Автор

My sister loved the " living dead doll" line... They are intentionally creepy its a horror doll line and the boxes are coffin shaped

jessicacaraballo
Автор

I remember the only hearts club. I really liked the diversity, at the time there wasn't a lot of dolls like that!

mila
Автор

I have a Little Miss No Name and she's one of my favorites! Sad Eyed Susie is also on my grail list. They were inspired by the big eyed children of Margaret Keane and I love how bizarre they are.

TheHomburgerNaeNae
Автор

Little Miss No Name and Suzy Sad Eyes are highly collectable and valuable! I collect the only heart dolls and pets and I think they're cute!

suzannebeinart
Автор

I live for Little Miss No Name lol first time I saw her in collector videos I thought she looked like some Charles Dickens-y Victorian Demon Child and I love it, clearly she didn't work for kids but she later became a big collectible item (especially with the tear still intact) and was used in several photoshoots and music videos and stuff. The late Kevyn Aucoin photographed Christina Ricci with the doll for one of his make up books. The only thing more unhinged than the doll is the tv commercial for her.

starberrycupcake
Автор

I actually love the 70s flat dolls, the unique eyes dolls look sweet, the shorties are a cool idea and the suzie sad eyes reminds me of the big eyes paintings.

cluelessworld
Автор

The doll with a tear was based on a pop painting of the late 60s. It was popular. So they made a doll out of it. I remember in 68, I got fox Xmas a paint-by-number set copy of this famous painting. Though I think I did a very poor job making her look worst.

michaelmcgee
Автор

I have ALWAYS wanted a little miss no name because of Margaret Keane's work. Such an amazing artist.

mightberudyguliani
Автор

I own a mystixx doll and while she's just chilling in my stock box right now, I personally think the gimmick was really cool + well-executed, and I wish the line could've become more widespread so I could get my hands on some in better condition for display.
Then again, I like creepy dolls and make a semi active effort to collect them (Little Miss No Name is a grail doll of mine), so maybe my opinion should be taken with a grain of salt :P

Novadolls
Автор

The stranger and creepier the better! YAY!

CookbookDivas
Автор

Personally I think Little Miss No Name and Suzie Sad Eyes are kind of adorable.

ariadnefrolich
Автор

Baby dolls that use the bathroom have been a thing for decades lol my mom and my grandma had dolls like that

yoruichisempai
Автор

The one thing I will say about Only Heart’s Club- they had REALLY high-quality clothes, especially for their size! My grandma briefly collected them and I wasn’t a huge fan of them but they didn’t seem creepy to me. I didn’t like the combination of plastic head/hands/feet on a soft fabric body (with wire so they were posable at least). But their clothes were NICE.

katehucks
Автор

For creepy, try Remco’s Laugh’o’lot doll from 1969. It’s face is in a permanent maniacal smile and it giggles when you activate it. Or even Mattel’s Baby Secret from 1959 who would whisper messages to you on a super creepy fashion and her mouth moved as she whispered!!

artchic
Автор

Double Trouble from the original She-Ra doll line had the two faced head thing too, but it was in a helmet that's part of the mold so you only see the front side. It was controlled by a dial on her back. I have the entire line aside from a few variants. I love them so much!

nubs
welcome to shbcf.ru