Inverse Laplace Transform, Sect 7.4#1

blackpenredpen

[anshallu]

The way he runs.... He doesnt even wait for 'thank you sir'.

[spread-peace]

2:08 I laughed at " do not put a +C because this is not integration ".

[fricken.fricks]

3!=6 so can you skip a step? More specially the step where you take 6 out of the inverse Laplace transformation and put 3!/3! in the equation. Just introduce 6=3!

[cadamsconradwilliam]

Thank you man!!! That’s what I wanted!!

[AdilKhan-wwyw]

Find Laplace inverse of 2s+3/(s+3)^3 and S^2/(s-1)^4

[brianramz]

You said you recommend doing it this way ...is there any other way?

[muradbashirov]

Actually it is integration, but improper

[megafightking]

What if it was a 2 instead of a 6, how will it be solved?

[davedonnie]

I dont think putting the 6 at the front is more "systematic." Who cares? If it works it works.