SOOTHE or SMOOTH...? TAME HARSHNESS in SECONDS.

preview_player
Показать описание
FREE PLUGIN CHEAT SHEET

NOIZE RACKS

NOIZE COURSES

MIXING & MASTERING SERVICES

FOLLOW ON INSTAGRAM
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Often people that usually say this item is not as good as the more expensive one they bought is simply to justify having spent that much and not waiting until the competition item came out... at an even lower price point.

I'm glad I didn't just jump on the Soothe 2 bandwagon, so now I can go purchase this instead, and use the 180 on something more useful like SERUM.

aaronbazil
Автор

Best smooth op video I've seen and I just watched 5 before I found yours thanks 🙏

luihawthorn
Автор

Surely it’s only a matter of time until DAW’s introduce their own version of dynamic stock plugins. I know you can make one yourself but, you’d think that they have the capability to have a designated plugin of their own.

Great video.

rossco
Автор

I thought I was watching Gents Scents for a second, if you know you know

dennisshelby
Автор

Fabio lendrum jamás voy a olvidar tu canción de out the water

DJFRANKSTUDIOS
Автор

great overview and comparison. but most of all WHAT IS THE SONG?!???!?!!!

sweeterthananything
Автор

soothe has been on my wishlist for ever, maybe I should give smooth a chance?

b-ohbeats
Автор

Man love this video so much! I feel that all my harshness has been tamed straight from the intro! On a serious note (lol), realising how important controlling the harshness is! I feel it's a big change towards getting more professional sound. Any tricks to tame (or even not introduce) harshness via stock plugins (e.g. ableton)?

nobodys
Автор

Hmm.. I’m failing 2 c how this is different from a dynamic eq!😩

na_der
Автор

thought this was going to be a comparison with soothe....

tendingtropic
Автор

No where close to SOOTHE2 in my opinion. Thanks for the video buddy! Have a great day everyone!

jesperholm
Автор

Interested to know…If you own FFQ3, would you find yourself using this at all really?

As you know with FFQ3 it has the frequency masking visual and so would be more beneficial for mixing aswell as doing dynamic compression.

I like Smooth but I have FFQ3…is there really anything Smooth has over FFQ3 apart from being cheaper and far less complicated?

Cheers.

rossco