Moral Relativism, Moral Absolutism | Jordan Peterson

Jordan Peterson defines More Relativism and Moral Absolutism.
Subscribe for more related content.⭐️

[Oxbowmars]

They way I learned discipline was from playing high school wrestling having to lose weight to make the right weight class. I never missed weight and it was hard I woke up early ever mourning with two pairs of sweat pants and ran. I lost 10.5 pounds in 2 weeks I ate only three small meals each day and ran ever mourning and wrestling practice in noon.

[stevengoldstein]

Moral disciple requires not being deceptive. Jordan has a history of this. This must be addressed that Jordan has practiced deception since 2009 in the Sordi Family Court case.

Jordan needs to address as part of a disciplinary probation order, a period of suspension may be imposed prior to the effective date of the probation. The Board's Disciplinary Guidelines provide details of the conditions under which a suspension may be made a part of the probation order. During suspension, licensees may not practice psychology or refer to themselves as psychologists. As indicated above in "Probation, " suspensions are considered disciplinary actions associated with probation orders and, as such, are public information and provided to consumers upon request.

Jordan is a Frasier Crane wannabe. He is an entertainer not a psychologist. Because he sells books and videos and lectures, THAT IS NOT THERAPY. He needs to address his bad conduct in courts in the case of Case 1 Sordi v. Sordi, 2009 CanLII 80104 (ON SC) he defamed a parent in court. In the case 2 R. v. Pearce, 2012 MBQB 22 (CanLII) he tried to free a murderer. Then in the case Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, 2023 ONSC 4685, he tried to avoid taking responsibility. He also tried to interfere in a family court case in Montana, the Kolstadt case, where there was a GAG order, he unprofessionally diagnosed a minor without interviews or assessments, and tried to defend unfit parents.