Tom & Jerry: Willy Wonka (2017)/Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (1971) Side-by-Side

A side-by-side, shot-for-shot comparison between the 1971 Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory and the 2017 Tom & Jerry remake.

Edited by Matt Skuta

[averymerrick]

Tom and Jerry can't support a 90 minute film by themselves anymore.
This is the reason for the crossover films now.

[dusksunsetio]

this is like a 14 year old making a self insert fan-fiction of their oc in their favorite show/video game without actually changing anything

[adultmoshifan]

I still love Tom & Jerry but this crossover is ridiculous! "All new original movie"? Yeah, right!

[captainpipsqueak]

Well, this is just offensive. It's LITERALLY just Charlie and the Chocolate Factory with Tom and Jerry in it for no reason.

[DeadPOOLParty]

That “Edible” line was a weed innuendo joke 😂

[firemiracle]

honestly, this movie would be much better without tom and jerry.
like the idea of making animated retelling based on the old version of the movie is actually awesome! why the hell did they added tom and jerry for??? i do like tom and jerry since it's been part of my childhood and all but... a crossover like this is not really necessary 😑

[KristaDLee]

"Original movie"

...are you sure...

[CrazyManhog]

Doesn't anyone think they only did this for nostalgia
I'm 21 saying this movie is indeed enjoyable

[okamiodonnell]

This just shows even more that if you took Tom & Jerry out of the movie, it would affect nothing. So there was no point in adding them. It's just an animated version of the original with Tom & Jerry running around in the background.

[KeeferJ]

First Tom and Jerry in The Wizard of Oz, now this?! What's next, Tom and Jerry in Chitty Chitty Bang Bang?!

[franks]

This is Warner Brothers cashing in on Gene Wilder's death. Just like how the Jumanji remake and Ghostbusters did (or doing) with the passing of Robin Williams and Harold Ramis.

[LegoandmoviereviewsBlogspot]

So this movie is just a shot by shot remake with Tom and Jerry in it...

[turtleboy]

For all its' faults, I think overall it was a pretty decent retelling. I'm sure Mr. Wilder would think so too. Or at the very least, he'd like it a lot more than the Johnny Depp remake. And he was VERY blunt about his indifference towards it.

[Lny_Forner]

Do you think God stays in heaven because he too lives in fear of what he's created?

[jeffreydahmer]

I love both versions but if I had to choose one it's the 2005 version it's closest to the book

[heranmouada]

Magic, excitement, enchantments, comedy, wonders, imagination, music, action, fantasy, thrills, and adventures. Tom and Jerry are in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. What a pleasant surprise. There is no life I know to compare with pure imagination

[marleyharris]

If you noticed this you get good luck in the movie version veruca had blood on her knee because it was a rock some people say she still has a scar from the injury

[robbietgmthegoldenminecart]

I would take the 1971 version always it's much better and violet inflates a lot more than in tom and Jerry even tho they did included a 1971 deleted scene where veruca gets disciplined which was exciting to see :)

[tvmattkc]

I LOL'd at the static snow that occurs when a scene with Tom and Jerry (not featured in the original) comes up

[romifox_k]

So I found the 1971 version on TV, I actually like it equally as the 2005 version of it

But the Tom and Jerry one is just a bit Painful and considering its just the animated version of the Original but lets add Tom and Jerry innit