Exposing the Flaws in Einstein’s Theory: The Relativity Hoax ft. @therealverbz

In this video, we delve deep into the provocative ideas presented by Jason Verbelli in his video "The Illusion of Light and Time - Relativity vs Reality." Join us as we challenge the very foundations of Einstein's theory of relativity, exploring the stark contrasts between relativity and classic physics. Are we living a grand hoax, believing in the warping of time and space? Or is reality as constant and unwavering as classic physics suggests? Through engaging commentary and thought-provoking insights, we unravel the complexities of these theories and present a simpler, more intuitive understanding of the cosmos. Get ready for a mind-bending journey that questions everything you thought you knew about time and reality.

#RelativityHoax #ClassicPhysics #TimeIllusion #JasonVerbelli #EinsteinTheory #CosmicTruth #PhysicsDebate #ScienceMysteries #RealityUnveiled #MindBendingScience

Become a member of this channel to enjoy benefits:

[GeekyNeil]

You say classic (sic) physics challenges the scientific dogma. That suggests there aren't experiments to back it up, but there are. What experiments have you seen which support classical physics? All you ask us to do is imagine some things. It doesn't matter how much I imagine things or how intuitive certain ideas seem. What matters is which view experiments support. Classical physics was tested by observing the planet mercury during a solar eclipse and found wanting.

[alschneider]

This video is pure AI click bait. The person or group do not understand the concepts involved. SR is not a stark contrast between relativity and classic physics. SR is an extension of classical physics. Newton himself said there is more to his laws than in his laws as he laid them out. He knew they would be extended. He said we must use these now to get on with it. Einstein is the man that extended Newton's laws.

[dddono]

very interesting! the realtime stuff is cool. it would have many implications regarding telescopes, i think. also, this pairs a little with an experience i had the other day. i feel like space is imaginary and i think that goes in line with the minimalist view. i say its imaginary because i can’t see it, only more stuff lol

[williamwalker]

Time and Space are absolute, but for different reasons than discussed in the video. Whether we see something as it is now or delayed by speed c depends on whether we are seeing things less than or farther than a wavelength from the source, or in other words in the nearfield or farfield. The same is true for the effects of gravity. The evidence for this is that the speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory,   and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion.

Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton.

Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity.  It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m.  In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx  h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield  Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles.




Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997