Nailed It! Woman Sues For Nail Gun Injuries - $2 Million Case (Full Episode) | Injury Court

McGuire v. Brooks: A woman sues for $2,000,000 when a contractor’s nail gun fires nails dangerously.

#PersonalInjuryCourt #InjuryCourt

Nailed It! Woman Sues For Nail Gun Injuries - $2 Million Case (Full Episode) | Injury Court

Season 1, Episode 23

[LadyDeon]

I'm so confused.. Mr Brooks told her where and what time to meet him.. she chose to do what she wanted to do and go ahead without him through a construction site.. now he has to pay for her decision to go against their agreement??? Make that make sense.. 🧐

[Fritsy]

They even proved the nail gun has to be against a surface to go off. Did this lady put it to her head and fire?! This man deserves justice. Especially after she blatantly disregarded his warnings and approved timeframe.

[MissBrittany]

This woman is 1000% responsible for her injuries she should have waited until mr brooks walked her through the house since he have been in business for many many years.

[deanfromhungary]

American justice system at its finest. A person ignores instruction, hurts herself, then wins the case... Unbelievable

[texasplayboy]

This judgment made zero sense. Just because an expert proved the nail gun can go through a hard hat, doesn’t prove negligence. At no point did they say the defendant was operating the nail gun. He wasn’t even there! I was waiting for the judge to ask what immediately led to the series of events and he never did. This is so strange.

[houstonb]

She should've just waited like the man said. I personally find her 99% responsible

[sinkvenice]

This is the fakest episode I’ve seen yet, that 911 call is hilariously bad.

[itsamandaabb]

I can’t with all of the plaintiffs on this show bandages and casts lol 😂

[mariaferrell]

She had no business going up to see what was going on especially when he called out to her and she ran in the house anyway ignoring him calling out to her. She had no business up there they were supposed to meet at the garage like he said he could've walked her through she was just being nosey and that's it in a nutshell.

[louishans]

He doesn’t have to pay anything and one sure he wouldn’t. Hire a lawyer and appeal that judgement.

[rashaungardner]

I don’t agree with this judgment - the nail gun had to be set off when pushed down. The nail gun shouldn’t have gone off by its own. It would’ve gone off if it was touched.

[kittyb]

So we endangered ourselves purposely and we can make back from it? Why was she there? Why was she anywhere near his tools?

[nickgrant]

No one explained how the nail gun was discharged. Did she trip and hit it ?

[GkFrk]

This makes no sense at all. The judgement seems to say "nail guns are too dangerous to use in a construction environment, so the defendant is guilty because he chose to use one." Had she waited for the defendant, as was agreed upon, the defendant could have contacted his crew to halt construction due to an untrained person being on site. All injuries could have been avoided. The plaintiff took it upon herself to enter the construction zone, bypassing barriers and obstacles, without informing ANYONE that she was entering or even present.

In construction, workers know that hardhats will not stop a nail from a nail gun. This is why we always announce our presence in the area before entering. There are rules a systems in place to prevent such workplace injuries. She should NEVER enter the area without a trained person with her and ESPECIALLY unannounced! It was the PLAINTIFF's own actions that caused her injuries, and she is 100% at fault.

This shows the injustice of the legal system.

[lindamusty]

I would like to know how the gun went off. She had to have picked it up and pushed the head against something to activate it to expel the nail. If it was laying on the table how could it have shot her in the head.

[danielarnold]

Are nail guns different in the US or something? Ours have a trigger and have to be pressed against an object to fire, only with both of those features will it fire unless tampered with and that would be the only way I could see Mr. Brooks would be at fault.

[englishwithdamoon]

What did he even do wrong?
Her mistake was going into an ACTIVE COUNTRUCTION ZONE

[lobotomizedbarbie]

dude’s asking why it’s relevant that she was wearing flip flops 😭 my guy, stubbing her toe is what started this whole mess

[ahmadollahdash]

Its totally the woman's fault she shouldent have sneaked into a construction site

[deangelorucker]

How is it you can do everything right by law and still fail and pay at the same time…