Ukrainian M1 Abrams Crew Abandons Tank After Mine Hit

In this intense footage, an M1 Abrams tank is seen after reportedly hitting a mine, which damaged its track and forced the crew to abandon the vehicle. As the crew retreats, an FPV drone zeroes in on the disabled tank to finish the job. The drone's strike, aimed at the right side near the center of the tank, highlights the vulnerabilities of armored vehicles in modern warfare. While the aftermath isn't shown, the impact likely caused significant damage.
.
.
..
...
Disclaimer
This video is for information purposes only. This channel is not biased toward any political agenda. May the peace prevail.
...
................I hope you enjoyed the video..................
--------------Please Like, Share and Subscribe!------------------
Note: Full Credit to Owner (All images, Music, and pictures shown in the video belong to their respective owners )
Disclaimer: This Channel does not endorse or facilitate any illegal activities, and all channeled material is intended for educational purposes only.

[davesaenz]

Those "Game Changer" tanks hit a shovel by accident.

[IRISHguitarist]

How many schools, swimming pools, health centres and other facilities in working class areas of the US could have been built for the price of those 17 Tanks? A Criminal waste of money.

[nimomemre]

US establishment thought they sending Abrams to Iraq 🤡

[lewisratford]

Abrams no longer fighting a lower tier opponent & can’t have air support.

[GegeDxD]

Abrams turned out to be very bad when it came to protect crews. Ukrianans calling it a moving coffin and avoiding that tank.

[parrotsarnoso]

The M1 only fought camels and goats. This is the first real war they ever see !

[mikerowave]

How much western propaganda laughed when russians installed bird cage on their tanks, now look at them, Abrams also have the cage.

[SRB.S]

The tragedy in all this is that these tanks from the West are not only Abrams, but also Challenger 2 and Leopard 2...Announced as "game changers"?! And they proved disastrous in their first real war! And that in every sense, the maintainer is catastrophically complicated, for training on western tanks you have to graduate from Harvard, disaster logistics, battlefield performance, too slow, large targets, poorly designed tracks, opto-electronics often broken, passability catastrophic, slow maneuver, equal to zero on the modern battlefield, they cannot be used as mobile artillery, shorter range of the cannon! All these shortcomings of Western tanks of the 3rd generation are precisely the advantages of Russian tanks when we compare it with the modernized Russian tanks T-72B3M, T-80BVM and the new T-90M, as well as older variants of the T-90. In all these segments, Russian tanks are far ahead, of western tanks of 3 generations. The same Russian tanks that are . Ridiculed in the Western mainstream media "as crap from tanks, which the Russians produce, new and defective and take chips out of washing machines to produce a tank"?! I don't see them laughing anymore!

Challenger 2 proved to be the worst of the three western tanks of the 3rd generation. Totally useless garbage, for a real war! And Ukrainians can confirm that! It is an "incredible game changer like Leopard 2 and Abrams" But only in newspapers and western propaganda media. On the battlefield, and in the real war, they are zero! Even zero is a big number!

And in the end, to make matters worse. The Russians are overhauling, from the beginning, modernizing their T-72B tank to the T-72B3M level. For approximately $600, 000-700, 000. The same tank will destroy the Abrams and later the Leopard 2. On the Leopard 2, Abrams or Challenger 2, for that money, 600, 000-700, 000, you can't even replace the tracks, let alone overhaul or modernize these tanks?! You need at least $4-5 million for something like that?! For tanks that in a real war and on a real battlefield will be much worse than Russian tanks, in terms of performance and performance, and cost 9-10 times more than a Russian modernized tank?! If it wasn't sad and stupid, it would be funny!


Has anyone who knows anything about the army and military equipment ever wondered why the Chinese, who can buy everything, get a license, or copy whatever they want, from military equipment...Why didn't they copy Abrams, Leopard 2, Challenger 2... But all their tanks, both new and older, are based on the T-72 tank!

Precisely because the Chinese are smart people and not fools! 3 world military and nuclear powers! Because they are not crazy to pay tens of millions of dollars for tanks, which on the real battlefield are not better than Russian ones, and those on Russian platforms, but they are even worse. And 10 times more expensive?! Shit, the Chinese don't watch AP, CNN, MSNBC, BBC ... They learn propaganda, fairy tales about how Western tanks are "game changers, technical miracles"?!


It's the same with India, 4 world military powers! And they can buy whatever they want and from whoever they want, and they bought a license to produce the T-90 tank "they must be poor fools, like the Russians and the Chinese"?! So why didn't they buy a license for some western "game changer"?! They give 10 million $, per piece and the performance on the battlefield is not even 10k $

[savvy.]

These were the wonder weapon and now I wonder where they are

[josephnoelsolina]

The Abrams tank is not suitable for Russian terrain unlike the T-90s. Autumn this year 2024 is now approaching the Russian mud will make the Abrams an excellent sitting duck due to sheer weight alone 😢

[mackenziecarver]

That’s literally the fifth Abrams that’s been destroyed. If this is seriously the best tank USA can offer, then I’m just amazed.

[kentriat]

The 17 are confirmed burnt out wrecks from video confirmation by several western sources. Another 6 are in for repair with Ukraine military waiting on parts from the USA. Russia is holding another two repairable ones and three of the destroyed units. All information is as confirmed by the United Kingdom.

The weight of the M1A1’s is the issue as they are too heavy for the road bridges and large culverts along with getting bogged down in the soft black souls of Eastern Ukraine. This means they are stuck driving on unsealed roadways which are subject to repeated remote mine laying.

[tonyhero]

Not abrahams tank its abrahams scrap 😂

[MrNatsuka]

How can shoves and recycled dishwashers able to damage a mighty NATO Abram tank? Must be Russian propaganda!

[alanadcock]

Incredible waist of tax $. Why are we waisting our time helping Bidens dirty deals.

[kieffer]

This is in Pokrovs frontline, every Ukrainian vehicles abandoned is considered a lost as Russia is conducting an offensive at that direction.
Eventually that place will come under Russian control.

[Putinism]

Why dont we see Ukrainians using Challenger 2 tanks..why we saw only abrams n leopards??

[amrozh]

Not a game changing weapon. Too much hype like an over inflated balloon...

[anibalcesarnishizk]

Although i am not a military man, i must say that Russia must be one of the countries that wins wars by losing battles.

[Huy-G-Le]

If anyone is surprise, because the profit media is hiding from you, but even rpg-7 can ounch through m1 abrams armors on any side that isnt the front.
This tank was design for ww2 era combat, not modern era combat.