believe in the math, not wolframalpha

preview_player
Показать описание
Believe in the math, not WolframAlpha. We will simplify this nested radical expression. This expression is usually from the cubic formula. Surprisingly, this expression gives us a whole number! Enjoy!

For more calculus tutorials, check out my new channel @just calculus
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The greatest trick humanity ever learned from mathematics - If you don't know some value, call it x and proceed.

vinayemani
Автор

Forget the math, I want to learn that marker-switching trick.

davidbondy
Автор

At 13:36 you can see that wolfram alpha is assuming the principal root is being used. If you click the option to use the real-valued root instead you will get the answer of 2.

georgeharamuniz
Автор

If you look just under the input box after he hits equals there is a blue box that contains the text "Assuming the principal root | Use the real-valued root instead." Click on the option for the real-valued root and it gives you 2. I do not know why Wolfram Alpha defaults to the principle root. But it will calculate the real value correctly. The same is true by the way when you use Mathematica by the way. However, I am not sure how to get Mathematica to return the real-valued root.

EdDavisTeaching
Автор

When you get an integer as a root, that makes you reeeeaaaally happy.

TheGregstar
Автор

Your marker switching skills are deft af.

Jiggerjaw
Автор

On Wolfram Alpha, you're showing the principle root. If you click "Use the Real Root instead, " you'll see your expected answer of 2.

That being said, I agree that it's bad to lean on Wolfram Alpha and Mathematica too much. But they certainly are nice tools when used correctly!

VandreiganMW
Автор

I feel like I disappointed him every time I don't pause to try 😅

windowsforvista
Автор

Whoever came up with this problem is a genius

AnalKumar
Автор

Russians do like this:


Finally, (1+sqrt(2)) + (1-sqrt(2))=2.

rustamkalimullin
Автор

The marker switch game is strong in this one.

zweiosterei
Автор

Impressive black pen red pen powers at 2:00

cheeros
Автор

I always enjoy when some complicated sq roots, cube roots etc. end up equaling some integer value :)

Robi
Автор

I believe wolfram alpha just shows you one of the correct answer, one of the complex solutions, because the cubic root of something actually leads to three results, not just one. You just can't take it as a real number for granted.

felonhighman
Автор

at the top it says:
Assuming the principal root | Use the real‐valued root instead

click the blue bit.. it shows 2!
so dont complain about wolfram alpha result untilk you READ THE RESULT

garmrdmr
Автор

2
7+5sqrt2 is 1+3sqrt2+6+2sqrt2 which is (1+sqrt2)^3 which means a=1+sqrt2
We do same for b and b=1-sqrt2
a+b=2

Nieznany
Автор

What really impresses me is how seamlessly you can switch between both pens. Amazing.

maxlarose
Автор

2:02 the way you swap between the black pen and red pen is so smooth, Jesus.

georgemissailidis
Автор

In WolframAlpha you have to use the Cbrt function which is the real-valued root: And the result is "2"

walter_kunz
Автор

click on "Use the real‐valued root instead"

bobbmsee