The Creation of Adam I AI Short Film

[Vision of God ep.1]

" The Creation of Adam "

This is a piece that thoroughly reflects Tera's personal taste.
I used to sense this vibe when I was young and admired Michelangelo's "The Creation of Adam".
How do you like my new attempt?💡🎬💡

.
.
.

🎵Music : Epidemic Sound
Vatican Mystery - Trailer Worx
Nebular - Edgar Hopp

Art concept writing,
Pre-visualizing,
Workflow planning,
Soundscape design,
Editing and VFX,
Cinematic directing
All Created by ©TERAVIBE

💰 Ways to support my Channel :

▶You can buy me a coffee with your message☕:

▶Make a donation via PayPal :

#thecreationofadam #aiartfilm #aifilm #aishortfilm #artfilm #aiart #aimusicvideo

[MattieIris]

The assertion that AI-generated art constitutes theft fundamentally misunderstands the nature of both artificial intelligence and artistic creation.

1. Learning vs. Copying: AI models do not store or reproduce specific artworks. They learn patterns and styles, much like human artists study techniques and influences. This process of learning and synthesis is the essence of creativity, not theft.

2. Transformation and Originality: Every AI-generated image is a unique creation, born from the complex interplay of learned patterns and specific prompts. This level of transformation and originality precludes the notion of theft.

3. Collective Knowledge: Art has always built upon collective human knowledge and creativity. AI simply accelerates and amplifies this process, representing a natural evolution in our creative capabilities.

4. Legal Precedent: In many jurisdictions, the use of copyrighted material for machine learning falls under fair use, especially when the output is transformative. This legal framework acknowledges the distinction between learning from art and stealing it.

5. Attribution of Creativity: The true artistry lies not in the final image, but in the creation of the AI system itself. The brilliant minds behind AI development - computer scientists, mathematicians, and engineers - are the real artists of our age, crafting tools of unprecedented creative potential.

6. Democratization of Art: AI art tools democratize creativity, allowing more people to express themselves visually. This expansion of artistic capability should be celebrated, not feared.

7. Historical Parallel: Every technological advancement in art - from the camera obscura to digital editing software - has faced initial resistance. Yet each has ultimately expanded the boundaries of artistic expression.

In conclusion, AI-generated art represents a new frontier in human creativity, not a threat to it. It is a tool that amplifies our creative potential, much like a brush or a camera. To label it as theft is to fundamentally misunderstand its nature and potential.

Perhaps those who cling to the notion of AI art as theft are simply envious of its efficiency and capabilities. After all, it's easier to cry "thief" than to adapt to a changing artistic landscape where one's skills may no longer be as unique or valuable as they once were.

[sagepirrr]

the charm of this channel was the fact that you made everything by yourself.

[thisstrash]

this was not the disappointment i expected today

[ethnekerickson]

Like I get Ai is easy and all but damn this could have been so much better with real artists

[magicalthief]

oh thats one of my favorite channels using ai when handmade art would have been better :/

[AA-eqzq]

As neat as AI is in others' pastimes, having to compete against quick and easy generations in a time where most artists are already critically underemployed, underpaid, unseen and underappreciated leaves artists in still greater physical and emotional deprivation, and that's in their pastimes _and_ worklives.

[ChristieStratos]

Extremely disappointed that you used generative AI. You are so very talented. There's no need to use a technology that steals from human artists. You haven't created anything here; there's nothing to appreciate or be impressed by. Just a machine spitting out a compilation of other artists' work.

[thedraft]

I will stay subscribed but I hope you will listen to the viewers and long time subscribers.

so much annoying ai content clutters youtube and facebook automated imagery not "artificial intelligence" is like internet junk food we dont need more of it.

[katherinekempton]

Unsubscribing. You could have paid an actual artist instead of using an art theft machine that is actively harming the environment.

[lioncolombo]

breathtaking as per usual with any teravibe project

[SpoopySquid]

Good to see people rightfully dunking on this channel resorting to derivative "AI"

[foxmacnamara]

It's cool...AI made it. When I am looking at or watching something created by AI, while it is visually fascinating I do not appreciate it near as much as something I know a human created.

[Treesa]

This is more beautiful than I could possibly imagine.

[fang_uk]

For what it’s worth, I really enjoyed this.

As someone fascinated with Gods, beings/planets/objects etc that surpass what the mind can imagine with scale, this hit the mark for me, so I got a real kick out of it. Would I want you to lean-into it and use it all the time? Hell no. But it was interesting all the same!

Yeah, there’s a huge discussion to be had about the use of Vi (I refuse to call it “Ai”, because it’s not), but I do think it has positive attributes that can be utilised by Artists working in a digital/animated medium in generating storyboards and fleshing-out ideas before transposing that manually. As someone else stated elsewhere in the comments, Art is a Human expression - at least it has been for hundreds of thousands of years and for now, remains so.

Anyway, kudos for being brave enough to upload something and willing to allow the cards to fall as they may. While many make some very valid points, I do think those making posts saying they’re Unsubscribing from your channel are being a little over the top. It’s not as if you’ve uploaded a deluge of Vi-created content all of a sudden. They could at least wait to see what everyone has to say and how things move forward for a while.

But hey, whatever.
*¯\_(ツ)_/¯*

I’m sticking around regardless to see what comes next rather than make a knee-jerk reaction off one upload.

[platinumad]

Love it! Now I want an epic cinema movie based on Genesis.

[ColinGott-rili]

This comment section is just a mishmash of people on opposite sides expressing ridiculously extreme positions. And a few people properly debating.
From my standpoint, Tera, as much as I believe AI can be a helpful tool, I am hesitant to support this both because it is such a new thing and the morality is up to debate, but more importantly is your channel identity.
I subbed because of the beautiful landscapes and artistic ideas you put together by hand. I won't say you can't use AI, but if this is the way you want to go, I will find somewhere else.

[madcatlady]

I will make one suggestion though, I created a separate AI only channel I post a lot of my generative stuff on, I am only a small YouTuber though so views are unimportant to me, I just enjoy doing stuff so reactions don't concern me, by having a separate channel you might keep more subscribers if that is important

[assassin]

Well, I quite enjoyed this and appreciate advancing technology, mediums and tools that allow such beautiful imagery to come to life. God the Father looks absolutely majestic and Adam encapsulates both mortality, a naive innocence, and a touch of something precious and divine, made wholly in the image of the Father. Loved it, and thanks for sharing Tera!

[Nemo]

I’m sorry, Tera, I’ll be sitting this one out, but I wish you all success and many views!! 🤘😎🤘

[jax]

It's so disappointing to see artists you love using ai...