Is it time to rethink how we choose our leaders? 🤔

The dynamics surrounding Kamala Harris's candidacy reveal a complex picture shaped more by public perception than by solid policy positions. With mainstream media painting her as both a moderate and a progressive, her supporters seem to be driven by vibes rather than clear stances on critical issues. This intriguing discussion raises essential questions about the criteria we use to evaluate potential leaders, especially in a polarized political landscape. Can a candidate thrive on charisma alone? Or do we need a deeper understanding of their principles and policies? Dive into this engaging discourse that challenges the traditional metrics of political support.

[mikebartlett]

If this country puts this woman in as president this country gets exactly what it deserves

[JeffHenson-np]

They can't announce their policies because if they did nobody would vote for them, and they know that.

[michaelalfano]

As the current VP, she seems to fight herself.

[bryanstrother]

Yellow school busses have wheels that go round & round. Did you just fall out of a coconut tree?

[larryp.]

It’s hard to have a position on anything when one is an idiot.

[peterskweres]

Prosecutor or convicted felon. Choice seems simple. Harris/Walz 2024

[andrewstephan]

Thank God we love in a world where we can choose a president based on vibes and who's not making mean tweets

[jimmypersaud]

Kamala vibes comes from her Jamaican(irish hindu) father roots in Jamaican culture the vibe vomes through rhe SMOKING of national 🌿 Marijuana. Just listen to its reagge stars. Tampon tim seems to have the best stock of this Herb 🌿.

[artiebeard]

At least she doesn't lie like Trump does. Trump had a press conference a while back and lied 162 times.