Alternative history of Pontus (ancient times)

Some people expected this since the beginning of my channel.
Here it is, even thought I made it like a long time ago (before my channel)

Credits (Music)

[ponticgreekmapper]

Its really bad but i was bored to make a remastered version, so here you go.

[sethfrisbie]

Who do you think would of won The Byzantine Empire or the Turks in an alternate timeline where the Fourth Crusade did not sack Constantinople?

[sethfrisbie]

You can do an alternate history of Sparta to where Sparta is the one who unites Greece and lives to this day yet you can also do alternate history of The Macedonian Empire to where it survives to this day.

[sethfrisbie]

Would it be funny to force a Frenchmen to listen to British and German music?

[alexandros]

Pontus is parcialy hellenic, not 100%, The Pontic dynasty comes directly from Darius 1

[bankruptmapping]

How Christianity never rose when rome is defeated by Pontus??

[sethfrisbie]

Here is another part of The Doctrine of Fascism:Fascism the
resolute negation of the doctrine underlying socalled scientific and Marxian socialism, the doctrine
of historic materialism which would explain the
history of mankind in terms of the class struggle
and by changes in the processes and instruments
of production, to the exclusion of all else.
That the vicissitudes of economic life —
discoveries of raw materials, new technical
processes, and scientific inventions — have their
importance, no one denies; but that they suffice
to explain human history to the exclusion of other
factors is absurd. Fascism believes now and always in
sanctity and heroism, that is to say in acts in
which no economic motive — remote or immediate
— is at work. Having denied historic materialism,
which sees in men mere puppets on the surface of
history, appearing and disappearing on the crest
of the waves while in the depths the real
directing forces move and work, Fascism also
denies the immutable and irreparable character of
the class struggle which is the natural outcome of this
economic conception of history; above all it
denies that the class struggle is the
preponderating agent in social transformations.
Having thus struck a blow at socialism in the two
main points of its doctrine, all that remains of it
is the sentimental aspiration-old as humanity
itself-toward social relations in which the
sufferings and sorrows of the humbler folk will
be alleviated. But here again Fascism rejects the
economic interpretation of felicity as something
to be secured socialistically, almost
automatically, at a given stage of economic
evolution when all will be assured a maximum of
material comfort. Fascism denies the
materialistic conception of happiness as a
possibility, and abandons it to the economists of
the mid-eighteenth century. This means that
Fascism denies the equation: well-being =
happiness, which sees in men mere animals,
content when they can feed and fatten, thus
reducing them to a vegetative existence pure
and simple.
After socialism, Fascism trains its guns on the
whole block of democratic ideologies, and rejects
both their premises and their practical applications
and implements. Fascism denies that numbers, as
such, can be the determining factor in human
society; it denies the right of numbers to govern
by means of periodical consultations; it asserts the
irremediable and fertile and beneficent inequality of
men who cannot be leveled by any such
mechanical and extrinsic device as universal
suffrage. Democratic regimes may be described as
those under which the people are, from time to
time, deluded into the belief that they exercise
sovereignty, while all the time real sovereignty
resides in and is exercised by other and
sometimes irresponsible and secret forces.
Democracy is a kingless regime infested by many
kings who are sometimes more exclusive, tyrannical,
and destructive than one, even if he be a tyrant.
This explains why Fascism — although, for
contingent reasons, it was republican in tendency
prior to 1922 — abandoned that stand before the
March on Rome, convinced that the form of
government is no longer a matter of preeminent
importance, and because the study of past and
present monarchies and past and present
republics shows that neither monarchy nor republic
can be judged sub specie aeternitatis, but that each
stands for a form of government expressing the
political evolution, the history, the traditions, and
the psychology of a given country. I also know school is getting in your way of getting ideas on uploading so I check to see if you are still alive.I been free this whole week.

[TheodorosEllinidis]

Me kairous kai xronia Pali dika mas thane