IT'S NOT THE MEN THAT HAVE STARTED MOST WARS 😶 @whatever

📅 Dating Talk is LIVE every Sunday & Tuesday 5:00 PM Pacific Time

[jerryjeromehawkins]

Look at her... she's desperately trying to figure out how to move the goalpost.

[nabtv-]

"Let's look at history here"
*Ignores History*

[voiceofexperience]

Fact Check: This goes for ALL female national leaders actually, not just hereditary monarchs.

[Nicholas.Rogala]

Maybe it's because they never had to fight a day in their life.

[KFish-bwom]

"Let's look at like history here"

[ Proceeds to offer a Disney channel understanding of history ]

[DMONEY]

People who never have to fight start wars.

[grueslayer]

Any man who's had a toxic girlfriend who thought it was ok to beat up their man while he doesn't do anything to retaliate because he was taught to never hit women... they know how violent women can get.

[gwauk]

“Men” do not wage war, a very very small minority of people wage war, the rest have no choice but to be participate. These sweeping statements are so moronic.

[sjoy]

If anyone had an argument with a woman, You would know who would start a war first...

[makaro]

And none of those Queens change Men for women soldiers,

[Tobiasu]

Here is my feelings.
Well here is some facts.
Oh but I feel that...

[tylershields]

At the end she was like dam what other bull can I pull out my brain

[sinistergamer]

😂😂😂 "oh suddenly I'm not disagreeing with you...sure...sure...can I move the goal now?"

[nalaka]

Imagine that, people being more likely to wage wars they won’t have to fight in

[Freethink.Rebellion]

It's probably because Kings, for the most part, had to actually go out in the battlefield and fight their own wars. Outside of Boudica, as far as I know, there were no "warrior queens."

[tripthemoon]

Because there are no warrior queens in history. It's easy to declare war when you're not the one having to fight it.

[theveryworstluck]

Let's look at history here: All wars have been ended by men.

[kennethgambill]

Accoring to Medium Queens were 27% more likely to wage War than Kings. According to the Daily mail

"The study was compiled by academics at Chicago University and College of William & Mary in Virginia. They wrote: 'We find that queenly reigns engaged more in inter-state wars relative to kingly reigns. Queens were also more likely to gain territory over the course of their reigns'."

[nunyabidness]

If there were no kings and only queens there would be no wars, only very intense negotiations every 28 days.

[TSnowy]

King xerxes of Persia was manipulated by his queen into waging war, and against the Greeks, a formidable force.