VIDEO: Climate change protesters arrested after spraying orange paint on Stonehenge monument

Two climate protesters were arrested on June 19, 2024, for spraying orange paint on the ancient Stonehenge monument in southern England, police said.

The latest act by Just Stop Oil was quickly condemned by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak as a “disgraceful act of vandalism.”

The incident came just a day before thousands are expected to gather at the 4,500-year-old stone circle to celebrate the summer solstice — the longest day of the year in the Northern Hemisphere.

English Heritage, which manages the site, said it was “extremely upsetting” and said curators were investigating the damage. Just Stop Oil said on the social media platform X that the paint was made of cornstarch and would dissolve in the rain.

Wiltshire Police said the pair were arrested on suspicion of damaging one of the world’s most famous prehistoric monuments and a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Stonehenge was built on the flat lands of Salisbury Plain in stages starting 5,000 years ago, with the unique stone circle erected in the late Neolithic period about 2,500 B.C. Some of the stones, the so-called bluestones, are known to have come from southwest Wales, nearly 150 miles away, but the origins of others remain a mystery.

Just Stop Oil is one of many groups around Europe that have gained attention — and received a lot of blowback — for disrupting sporting events, splashing paint and food on famous works of art and interrupting traffic to draw attention to global warming.

The group said it acted in response to the Labour Party's recent election manifesto. Labour has said if it wins the election on July 4, it would not issue further licenses for oil and gas exploration. Just Stop Oil backs the moratorium but said it wasn't enough.

[Hope-rmft]

Seriously, another group of people spraying something orange and messing with private property is sick to me for what reason it doesn’t make any sense to me make it make sense !!!

[Partyrockers]

To be fair it’s the most overrated world wonder

[papimasfuerte]

So what was the point of this? What's the message?

[dontownsend]

Introduction:

Many people are concerned about climate change and its potential impacts on our planet. However, it's essential to approach this topic with a critical eye, questioning the assumptions and evidence presented by mainstream narratives.

Skepticism Towards Climate Models:

One of the primary concerns for climate skeptics is the reliability of climate models. These models predict future climate conditions based on various assumptions and inputs. Skeptics argue that these models have not consistently predicted climate trends accurately in the past, raising doubts about their projections for the future. They emphasize that the complexity of climate systems, with numerous variables and potential feedback loops, makes precise modeling exceedingly difficult.

Historical Climate Variability:

Skeptics often point to historical climate data showing significant natural variability in Earth's climate long before industrialization. They highlight periods such as the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age as evidence that climate can change naturally and significantly without human influence. This perspective suggests that current climate changes might also be part of natural variability rather than primarily driven by human activity.

Economic and Social Impacts:

There is also concern about the economic and social impacts of aggressive climate policies. Skeptics argue that measures to reduce carbon emissions, such as shifting to renewable energy sources or imposing carbon taxes, could lead to higher energy costs, job losses in certain industries, and overall economic disruption. They advocate for a balanced approach that considers both environmental protection and economic stability.

Questioning the Consensus:

Climate skeptics often question the consensus presented by the scientific community. They argue that science is not based on consensus but on rigorous testing and validation of hypotheses. Skeptics call for open debate and further research, asserting that dissenting opinions and alternative theories should be given a fair hearing rather than being dismissed.

Human Ingenuity and Adaptability:

From this perspective, human ingenuity and adaptability are crucial. Skeptics believe that humans have the capability to adapt to changing conditions through technological innovation and improvements in resilience. They argue that instead of focusing solely on mitigating climate change, more effort should be put into adapting to its potential impacts, ensuring that societies are prepared for various possible future scenarios.

Conclusion:

In addressing climate change, it is important to critically evaluate the evidence, consider historical context, and weigh the potential impacts of proposed policies. By fostering open debate and prioritizing adaptation alongside mitigation, we can develop a balanced approach that respects both environmental and economic concerns.