Käärijä - Cha Cha Cha (Finland) | Grand Final - Jury Show #EurovisionJuryShow

preview_player
Показать описание
Käärijä - Cha Cha Cha (Finland)
| Grand Final - Jury Show #EurovisionJuryShow

#Käärijä #ChaChaCha
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

people saying his vocals werent perfect - loreen isnt the best vocalist in the show, either. shes good, but she was clearly judged for the whole package, such as how expensive and modern the staging looked. unicorn got a lot of points for the same reason. eurovision is quickly becomnig a show in which the jury looks not just in a narrow vocal and "spotify friendly" criteria list, but also who can afford making the most expensive stage show. both of which are sadly criteria which overlook X factor and the parts of a performance that cant be judged in such logical, quantifiable ways.

christianj
Автор

All the people saying his vocals "sound off" think that live performances are supposed to sound exactly like the studio recording. Go be uneducated elsewhere.

Wrmngr
Автор

Thank you for sharing the jury final recordings.

_Grops_
Автор

Wow, he is amazing! Thanks for sharing!

lilasofya
Автор

It is difficult to sing and dance at the same time, which is recognized by singers. Käärijä is very good, with a real voice, good originality, humorous and interesting banter, and singing in his own mother tongue, which is very good. If you point out the standard, Käärijä is his unique style. I like it very much and I was instantly fascinated💚💚💚💚💚💚👍👍👍👍👍

qq-lpdu
Автор

Absolutely killed it! 😎 this will forever be the most robbed eurovision entry

candyking
Автор

Käärijä did so well ♥ everyone is so proud!

Sipu
Автор

From my understanding the jury categories are the song itself(originally and composition)
Live performance( vocal part and staging of the performance) and then crowd/audience reactions. When Loreen’s performance is designed to be the strongest if any other songs are at a huge disadvantage. It’s kind of unfair but it’s not against the rules to perform in a way that are above the standards that the jury apparently has that it becomes an unfair advantage.

munaclassic
Автор

Käärijä is so dynamic and he really stands out 💚 love it

laurenw.
Автор

Hot take: his vocals in the jury final is better than in the televised grand final

fannishfanning
Автор

When 70% of the decisions the jury make are based solely on the performance and over half on the strength of the performer(s) themselves. It’s reasonable someone to think a performer has a decent fan base to fight the televote battle so absolutely stun the jury and gain their points.

munaclassic
Автор

People who say originality should count for more it’s not the main focus of its own “category” the jury were given. Also using many samples from different sources and having it sound amazing is a massive component to COMPOSITION the other part to originally and as originally in a decent amount of genres is hard it’s not super important.

munaclassic
Автор

This song should have won. It's a SONG contest not SINGING contest

vol.
Автор

Somehow the audio mix makes his voice sound really weird in the second part... Like worse that hos actual singing is

achnix
Автор

do you have a link for the footage from the semi 1 jury show

gemz
Автор

In my top 100 for year end review most listened to tracks. Still a travesty the judges stole their win.

grubu
Автор

Yeah if a live performance wasn’t required the Käärijä wins over Sweden but then the debate becomes Finland vs Norway.

munaclassic
Автор

Could you possibly find the Mad VMA version of Cha cha cha with Kalomira?

Helena.Alexandra
Автор

That’s why Jury should be in semifinals as well

linpet
Автор

Peoples with voice, in other countrys trying to get IN THE FINALS of the National Selections, while Finland is sending Käärijä, a random boy, with 0 voice, just CHA CHA CHA. Not for me ! This is Eurovision, not ur Nught Club. There are winners like, 2016, 2017, 2012, 2014, 2021.. If this boy was the winner. I cant imagine . This is not worth to be even in the finals🤣

ADE