Physics 62 Special Relativity (17 of 43) Galilean Transformation

In this video I will review Galilean transformations (in regards to classic mechanics).

Next video in the Special Relativity series can be seen at:

[etglasstortvand]

Been watching all the way from 1 of 43 today! Had to leave a comment thanking for all the time you've put into this! :)

[alindamanda]

Why not x=x'-vt due to x=x0+vt, the position in time is equal with the initial position plus the distance covered in time, which of course will be vt.
It should be specified where is the initial x0.
When x' is the initial then x-x'=vt, so x=x'+vt.
And when x is the initial then x'-x=vt, so x=x'-vt.
Both are true but only when you specify frames of referrence in both sides.

[pubuduchathurangeekanayake]

I came looking for copper, I found Gold

[jaydoubleli]

Does this imply there is some point in space that can be considered stationary?

[priscendawithpuchi]

Sir, I can't thank you enough. I was literally struggling with this theory for a long time, I watched some videos on it in my native language to understand it better but I still had some doubts. But, today I understood it crystal clear I can't explain how happy I am. Thanks again ✨

[tookurjaerbs]

That actually made sense! Thank you, sir

[ianquaynor]

great work! very easy to unnderstand. Thank you!

[chavab]

it's distracting to deal with Y and z axes since they are (fortunately) not moving w/r/t S' -- the material is difficult enough to follow with just one axis of movement -- but thank you for a beautiful series

[mezoadeeb]

It is a great work you did, god bless you.

[valeriereid]

Thank you Professor for making this so easy to understand. You are the best teacher ever.

[COULGHOULLADY]

Do you have any lectures on mathematical logic and proofs. My calculus 1 class in university has it in the syllabus.

[huzaimkhan]

Sir How we will find the velocity of event in moving reference frame( in this video which is moving with velocity u).

[lakhyajit_chutia]

thank you sir, you made my life easy.

[irshadahmed]

Galilean Transformation is valid for accelerated or non accelerated frame of reference?