The Money Multiplier Method | Brent Kesler

preview_player
Показать описание
Brent Kessler was $984,711 in third party debt. Hearing this 200-year-old concept, he was able to pay all of it off in 39 months. Mr. Kesler will be going in-depth on The Money Multiplier Method and teaching individuals how to break the bonds of financial slavery they don't even realize they are in! This is a method that he travels all around the country to teach; how to recycle, recapture, and keep total control of your hard-earned dollars; a method to avoid fractional reserve banking about it! Mr. Kesler will be showing you how to get ALL the money back for every car you will ever buy, drive, and own for you and your family, for the rest of your life.

Social Links:

About MoneyShow

Founded in 1981, MoneyShow is a privately held financial media company headquartered in Sarasota, Florida. As a global network of investing and trading education, MoneyShow presents an extensive agenda of live and online events that attract over 75,000 investors, traders and financial advisors around the world. We are proud to bring together individuals, top market experts, analysts and media in dynamic, face-to-face and online learning forums that include highly acclaimed investment shows, conferences, and cruises.

For more than three decades, we've been empowering individuals with a passion for investing and trading. We arm individual investors and traders with state-of-the-art tools, a powerful skill set and a clear understanding of the markets so they can pave their own path to profitability.

#Investing#InvestSmarter#MoneyMultiplier
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

What a difficult crowd. It's like they each ate a cow and are too bloated to even show any emotion. Great job Mr.Kessler!!

tilitila
Автор

I'm blown away at how nobody knows this, that I know anyway. Thank You Mr. Kessler, your service is so welcomed in todays world. God Bless You.

KC-hryz
Автор

Even if pay car with policy loan you still have lto pay dollar for dollar back into the policy but at the same time with premium deposits..so 2:1. Vs 1:1. Desiring to fully see what's happening in means of exchange 😎

dailstancill
Автор

Equity can be collaterized like CV, with property as collateral vs DB as collateral for policy loan.

dailstancill
Автор

Most will struggle to get that first payment, it only works if you can get it. Both examples given were already rich

Thatufo
Автор

Step-1: First the law. In the beginning there were gold coins. Then there were certificates for the amount of gold. Those certificates were called "promissory notes", aka negotiable instruments, aka bills of exchange, aka money. The courts ruled that a note assigning an UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE TO PAY is money. The banks took it a step further.Step 2: When a person goes to a bank to borrow money for a house the bank provides the person with a promissory note. The person signs the promissory note. The bank takes that promissory note and deposits it in a TRANSACTION ACCOUNT. The account is arrange the same way your banking is arrange with debits and credits.Step 3: Each time you make a mortgage payment money is deducted from the principal /interest “owed”. When your payment is completed the accounts zeros out and the books are balanced. The promissory note becomes worthless – completion voids its value.Step 4: This promissory note money is called ENDOGENOUS money by some economist. Some groups call it DEBT, other people call it currency. Some people like to hide the bank's exploits by claiming that it is debt and not money. But that is irrelevant because we are looking for the effects of this money in society. It behaves differently than FIAT money in that it loses value once the note has been paid off. By far most of the money we use in our economy is this endogenous money. Last year there were 2.0 trillion dollars worth of paper money, but approximately 17 trillion dollars worth of this endogenous money.What I am not clear about is what happens to the house once the Federal Reserve balances the commercial bank loan (Quantitative Easing). I don't see the Federal Reserve selling houses. I dont see the government selling the foreclose homes. I don't see the taxpayers getting the value of their money back once they bail out the banks. They claim that the money goes into reserve accounts. Are commercial banks getting free houses?People say all kinds of things but they never provide me with research or study on how the “citizenry” get back the value of these homes they just bailed out.

seensnakes
Автор

In the example towards the end where he pays off $450K, can someone explain why he’s not using the money in the segregated account to pay down the original loans? At the beginning of the next year, he’ll be able to borrow against a higher cash value, since the loans were paid down? And he’d save some interest that’s accruing against the loans.

eddonovan
Автор

If bankers make money on loan interest & IBC is about ' becoming your own banker ", why would the banker ever want the policy loan interest ever paid off? Seems borrower & banker can't coexist and still maximize their profit??? Kind of like a real estate agent serving as "dual agent" ...not truly achievable. True?

dailstancill
Автор

Between 17 & 22 min, you show a loan vs cash buy car scenario. When I put it in a spreadsheet, the fellow who paid cash has $32, 150 in the bank, where as the borrower has $30, 627. This assumes the would-be payment is redirected to the bank account. It seems that when you do your comparison ($30K to $28K) you neglect the $4K paid as interest on the loan. I think CASH wins in this race. Put it in a spreadsheet and do the math!

charleslemaire