Image Sensors as Fast As Possible

preview_player
Показать описание
Image sensors allow us to have amazing cameras in all types of devices, many of which are becoming smaller and smaller all the time... But what makes these sensors so darn impressive?

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Anyone else catch the 2 in the binary numbers at 1:53 ?

RocketBass
Автор

CUDA CORES vs STREAM PROCESSORS PLEASE

Itbankrock
Автор

this guy's voice is sometimes hard to listen to, but this is just the video I needed to watch, answered all my questions

SeanDaPaulSeh
Автор

I just got into film, amazing process, especially learning to develop it yourself! And you get a physical copy of all of your pictures, which you can reprint infinitely!

mcb
Автор

Film cameras are really nice, I recommend everybody use them sometime. It teaches you to not be lazy with your photography and also gives you much more respect for pretty much everything to do with pictures. You can also mix your own solutions for hella cheap so it just takes more time than digital nowadays.

EmBeeSeven
Автор

Linus! A Topic for you!

Can you PLEASE make a comparison once and for all about what the big differences are between DLP and LCD Projectors!? I am really stuck as to which type of projector has the least amount of input lag as possible (for gaming of course). Can you please settle this?

Thank you so much for your consideration.

JonnySelProductions
Автор

Yes I totally and completely understood everything in this video because I'm so smart... *cough*

AthenaAGT
Автор

CCD sensors have lower digital noise when given enough light but they are terrible in low light. CMOS sensors are kind of the opposite however the technology for CMOS is improving too.

smokey
Автор

Nigga I'm leaving here even more confused about image sensors.

itaku
Автор

*nods*, *nods*

So they work through magic.. Got it!

DigitalMonsters
Автор

Linus lost me at 0:15, after that i just zoned out and realized it was 4 in the morning

DumDumGameming
Автор

This again, makes me wonder how efficient and effective our eye's mechanism of capturing and processing images when comparing to the current technology (May/2020).

HassytheWitcher
Автор

I think the reaosn why people are so confused about this one is that he didn't really take the tie to explain the OLD system of how images are captured.

With film photography, the lens of your camera leads light into the rectangular hole right in front of the film when the shutter opens. The film is made of a special material consisting of crystals sensitive to light on a transparent piece of plastic. It's literally a piece of transparent tape lined with crystal.

When the film is developed, parts of the film that receive more light become black, and parts that recieved no light basically fall of the tape, leaving transparent film. This is why developed film is "negative", or reversed color.

A DIGITAL IMAGE SENSOR attempts to work the same way as how the crystals on traditional film are CHEMICALLY ALTERED when exposed to light.

Think of the sensor as that film that lies behind that rectangular hole in a film camera, but in a much smaller size, and instead of "crystals" that get exposed to light at a microscopic scale, you have little teeeny tiny squares, one for EVERY PIXEL, that are each recording data for the amount of exposure to light, and the color of that light, among other information (color has temperature and tint as well as exposure, there are lots of variables).

So instead of developing a piece of FILM to remove MICROSCOPIC CRYSTALS to give a perfect image, a sensor is reciving pixel-to-pixel information, and a computer chip is processing the value of every one of those pixels.

incjumpStARtR
Автор

I've heard from some a few years ago that the extreme enthusiasts only use film because of it's pure nature. I wonder how true that is or will be as the digital photo process get's so much better than it was.

therealrbert
Автор

Linus... as much as I love you (being the 14th that you published it), I have to disagree: CCD technology USED to have lower noise at specifics ISOs, specially lower ones. Which for most professional photography types, is needed most. But things have changed in the last 8 years. CMOS sensors have reached the same level of noise at low ISOs, while retaining greater IQ in the high ISOs, as they have better signal amplifiers, and specially since the convertion to digital has fewer steps, and therefore, less electronic noise is created. Anyway, almost all camera manufacturers have switched by now to CMOS, instead of CCD. Perhaps there are a couple medium format sensors out there that are CCD, but don't expect them to be many. 

alanschamber
Автор

Was that whole video done in one take? BREATHE LINUS

KvnOrdnz
Автор

On a similar topic I think you should cover RAW image capture and its benefits/drawbacks compared to using the camera's processing to create JPEGs

MrTitskie
Автор

A question about the sensor.
Which one is better and offers the better image quality?
1/2.5" Progressive Scan CMOS
1/2" Progressive Scan CMOS
1/1.8" Progressive Scan CMOS

shajibhatti
Автор

The voice cracking at the start of this video makes me love it all the more

danielfatfingahs
Автор

My first POTENTIAL gaming rig: (Need advice)
CPU: Intel core i7-4790
MOBO: MSI Z87M-G43
GPU: MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2GB
RAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB Ram
HDD: Western Digital Cavier Blue 1TB 
SSD: Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB
PSU: Corsair CX600
Case: NZXT H440

Can I have some advice on what to change please?

andrew-vjuo