Supreme Court 8-1 Order Shatters Immediate 'Assault Weapon' & Magazine Case Hopes! State Seeks Delay

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video I break down an important update in an "assault weapon" ban challenge after the Supreme Court's recent emergency denial!

🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥

📷 My YouTube Setup 📷

Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.

DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Support the channel by subscribing, turning on "all notifications" and liking the video!

ArmedScholar
Автор

Are muskets protected by 2A? Yes they are. In 1792 when 2A was ratified were muskets military "Arms"? Yes they were. Any ruling stating that 2A does not protect military "Arms" is then a lie.

bzerker
Автор

This is insane we go from 5 pages to 3500 . That's what cowards do .

Sparky-oopw
Автор

ALL ARMS ARE PROTECTED. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is pretty F-ing straightforward don't ya think

norsewarlock
Автор

The second amendment was never intended to be cherry picked. Government of the people for the people, military of the people for the country. Access to arms whatever they may be “shall not be infringed”…

joshshort
Автор

Howdy All ! This dumb stuff needs to come out of their pockets instead of the taxpayers money

unclemike
Автор

Native Texan here. I believe the United States of America has three assholes, California, Illinois, and New York. Yes, there may be some other places that dribble a little but I'm so tired of the shit from the big three!

terryavey
Автор

Where does it say in the second amendment I can't own a military rifle. Where does it say in the second amendment that the government has the right to declare what is dangerous and unusual.

davidcompton
Автор

"Weapons of war" Were the norm that people possessed when the 2nd Amendment was enacted. The whole purpose of the 2nd Amendment was civil defense.

Bearfacts
Автор

All firearm laws or regulations are unconstitutional!

oo-robu
Автор

Over and over again, I am convinced that our Constitution is truly one of the best documents ever written. It’s so sad that so many are working so hard to tear it down.

wbooth
Автор

This issue needs to be settled once and for all by SCOTUS and uphold our Constitutional Rights to these ARMS, including magazines over 10 rounds.

jacobew
Автор

No military in the world uses the AR-15, so how is it considered a "military weapon?"

cowboyofscience
Автор

🙏 for judge Thomas and Ilinois. Thanks man

oneboyscout
Автор

The ONLY time anything is DANGEROUS is when a CRIMINAL is involved. So go regulate them.

pcmedic
Автор

Pritzker bribed two of the judges in the 7th circuit with "campaign contributions". Seven figures each. Standard procedure in Illinois.

danielvoegele
Автор

It doesn't matter if it's a military-style weapon or not, shall not be infringed

Felon_With_A_Pew
Автор

Former 30 year Chicagoland resident here, they're gonna hang on to this forever. I have a case that was supposed to be expunged almost 20 years ago, and again about 8 ago, and one last time about 5 years ago... still fighting that to this day because IL is corrupt as hell! We've all seen Dolton right??? Check Orland Park, Monee, Harvey, and just about all of Cook county.

jdizzforyou
Автор

Vote for Harris if you want to lose your guns and gun rights.

James-unzj
Автор

I have supported the channel since I first started watching. Let the judge imprison the attorneys for dumping the papers on the judge

kevinstich