Testing Synology and TrueNAS NFS VS iSCSI

preview_player
Показать описание

Benchmark Links used in the video

Synology Tutorials

XCP-NG Tutorials

Linux Benchmarking

Getting Started With The Open Source & Free Diagram tool Diagrams.NET

Connecting With Us
---------------------------------------------------

Lawrence Systems Shirts and Swag
---------------------------------------------------

AFFILIATES & REFERRAL LINKS
---------------------------------------------------
Amazon Affiliate Store

UniFi Affiliate Link

All Of Our Affiliates that help us out and can get you discounts!

Gear we use on Kit

Use OfferCode LTSERVICES to get 5% off your order at

Digital Ocean Offer Code

HostiFi UniFi Cloud Hosting Service

Protect you privacy with a VPN from Private Internet Access

Patreon

⏱️ Timestamps ⏱️
00:00 NFS VS iSCSI
01:42 Scope and Setup
02:45 Difference Between iSCSI & NFS
08:50 Test Results
12:48 Storage Design Considerations
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Great video! Looking forward to the storage design video.. Thank you!

falazarte
Автор

thanks for this easy to follow comparison between NFS VS iSCSI!

chrisipad
Автор

Thank you for this video.

Yes, I would definitely love to learn more about the different use cases for iSCSI vs. NFS.

I've never really dove into much, so thank you for putting this video together and explaining this to us.

I greatly appreciate it.

ewenchan
Автор

I think a deeper dive into the philosophy of storage design would be helpful! I've setup ISCSI, Fiber Channel, and SMB/NFS shares in the past and through various VMware topologies but never really got into the nitty gritty of optimizing storage for your VMs for performance, security, and scalability :)

joshsmith
Автор

The case you mention near the end of the video with a Graylog VM, and how to handle the storage differently would be super helpful to me! I'm planning on setting up Graylog (sort of half started already) and the storage aspect is one part I was very unsure about.

joelsmith
Автор

Side note: I have found that Synology always reattaches via ISCSI when the VM reboots. My Qnap NASs often had trouble and needed me to manually mount the drive.

What you do is uses block storage and then use Veeam to snapshot and backup the individual VMs. Works great.

engrpiman
Автор

Great video, I'm in the market to build a network storage solution and this was very much in my interest. I have the requirement for family storage but I also host VM's as well that will be utilizing the storage

devoid
Автор

Would be very interested in different use cases of running a Windows VM with ISCi and how the data should interface with the VM. Looking forward to that and more. Thanks

Actionjack
Автор

Interesting content. This was always a hot topic when implementing either EMC or NetApp systems with VM Ware and/or Windows running on bare metal in a clustered environment. I'm sure a lot has changed since I touched those, but at the time tiered storage was handled differently at a block vs file level.

handlealreadytaken
Автор

hmm . . . I have thin provisioned iSCSI before. Just this week in fact.
Excellent video, sir 👍

chromerims
Автор

24:20 If you think you'll need to use snapshots on truenas/zfs. Why not make multiple zvols ...one per vm, instead of one zvol for a pool of VMs?

tedmiles
Автор

How about using VMM Pro as an hypervisor? Would the performance be better compared to the setup you tested?

mscari
Автор

As mentioned about TrueNAS and restoring snapshots, this is why I set up separate extends for each VM, so no two VMs live on the same LUN.

Mr_Sprint
Автор

Benchmark Links used in the video

Synology Tutorials

XCP-NG Tutorials

Linux Benchmarking

Getting Started With The Open Source & Free Diagram tool Diagrams.NET


⏱ Timestamps ⏱
00:00 NFS VS iSCSI
01:42 Scope and Setup
02:45 Difference Between iSCSI & NFS
08:50 Test Results
12:48 Storage Design Considerations

LAWRENCESYSTEMS
Автор

What was your disk layout on the TrueNAS system? I am trying to run the same suite, and I am getting 300seconds on the SQLite tests.

itgoatee
Автор

Hey Tom, can we do a segment about CEPH?

RyanOHaganWA
Автор

Running TrueNAS Core and ESXi. Both, the NAS and the ESXi are using thin provisioning with iSCSI. The ESXi even sends UNMAP commands to TrueNAS when a thin disk shrinks (files are deleted on the GuestOS FileSystem).

andibiront
Автор

Did you use NFS 4.1 and multipathing? I may have missed your NFS setup.

hazaqames
Автор

super good explaination, I've used the "ethernet to HDD" analogy before to describe iSCSI. or a "locally appearing, network attached raw block of a drive that looks like a locally installed drive to the layman."

Ethernet to HDD is better I guess.

phrag
Автор

In spite of some performance degradation, NFS all the way for me. I find the convenience and flexibility are worth a lot more than the performance gains (in some cases) of iSCSI. Thanks for the video.

adam
visit shbcf.ru