This Film Camera save you so much money

Looking to reduce film usage and related costs? The Kodak Ektar H35 Half Frame Film Camera not only looks, but also packs a punch!
.
.
#kodak #kodakektar #filmcamera #halfframecamera #halfframe #filmphotography

[dooterino]

A couple things: you don't realize how many shots 72 really is until you want to change the film you're using, and also if you really like half-frame you should eventually look into a Pen F for a much higher quality option

[whosjozikolnik]

things to consider are:
- labs might have trouble scanning the small negatives
- small resolution due to the size of the negative
- I believe it doesn't have a good aperture so use higher iso film

[GhostlyFilm]

I have one and man it it awesome to double the amount of pictures from any roll

[hermanzhang]

My opinion is that if you shoot film, you should buy the pure machanical bodies, which is better in terms of both image quality and built quality because film is already too expensive

[shadowandlight]

I have the original Canon from the 60’s. It was made to save people money to get more shots. However, unless you develop your own film it is kind of useless. You can get some cool shots that are interesting if you keep the shutter count memorized so you know which pictures will be in the same 35mm frame as it is a half frame.

[againtjugofcocomilk]

I have a few actual vintage ones from the 80s

[GoofyGooberElite]

There were lense attachments to some of these classic Kodak’s. This may be a collectors item

[dklm]

I have a Kodak from 1916 that’s 16 years after the first new generation of Kodak cameras

[roachtoasties]

Before I played this video I thought this was about a camera from the 1970's. Nope. I was surprised it's a camera being sold today.

[nvcw]

The picture quality is about what you'd expect from a film format 1/2 that of conventional 35mm shot through a plastic lens. It's a neat little novelty camera with acceptable performance. I'd say it's almost as good as an old 126 film camera. With the high cost of 35mm film, half frame is twice as economical.

In all, it works fine for what it is. A novelty camera.

[eddievenuto]

My dad's mother would have a camera and it would be a film camera. She wasn't a great photographer by any means. She didn't even know photography. She could take the same image over and over and she just liked taken photos. It was one of those old cameras that had film. It was almost like I don't know. What's from like nineteen ninety seven. I like the d three personally nikon d three I love nikon

[philgiglio]

110 cartridge film is the same stock as 35mm, only it has sprocket holes along 1 edge only; instead of both edges in the 35mm stock

[CoolCademM]

Would have got it if I didn’t have a perfectly working SLR 35mm film camera with adjustable lenses.

[nazarjuna]

Kodak cameras need films that are 400 ISO and above. Their photos always seem underexposed.

[shanividal]

My problem is that it is hard nowadays to find places that develops film...😢

[dignoragonzalez]

I just got it, I'm excited!! #beginner

[lovinqxtae]

woah! this will be perfect for a trip..where can I get it?

[guillermo]

Half frame!? 😱
Kinda reminds me of the super 35 idea

[aussiegruber]

What’s it like trying to develop it being half frame

[axmsk]

Agfa is bit cheaper, its 37$, while kodak is 45-50$