Philosopher W.V.O Quine made Easy-er... (and O'Grady)

QUINE may be controversial at a time, but like let me explain it easy. Though this video is a part of a series covering philosopher Paul O’Grady, this one video I decided to make separate to focus just on Quine, so even if only interested in Quine this video will offer sufficient visual substance for someone new to Quine to begin to grasp what is going on his philosopher in some more general and surface sense. I try not to get into too much nitty gritty details and focus on the l;arger picture and outcomes of his philosophy. The video will explain some of the background to Quine’s motivations and some of the contention with his work. It’s just a starter not to meant to be perfect or detailed just to get us through the impacts in ontology and epistemology. SO PLEASE ENJOY

If you like my work do follow
Twitter:
To support me
or

If you are reading this I mean shouldn’t you SUBSCRIBE then?

If you would like to start this playlist / series from the beginning click here!

CHAPTERS
0:00 Introduction
4:00 Quine's Observation Sentences
7:52 Failures of Logical Construction
13:09 Quine's Web of belief
17:19 Everything - Changed
24:24 How different can things be for Quine
29:00 Criticism - Tension & Meanings
32:55 Conclusion - what to take from this video

OTHER VIDEOS:
Map of Science videos

Ontology video

Logic video

True for me playlist list (completed series)

Kuhn video

MUSIC:

Open and end cards
Track: Last Heroes - Dimensions [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.

Kevin Macleod’s Music:
Dreams become real
Industrial cinematic
Crusade – Heavy Industrial
Twisting
Tenebrous brothers carnival – Prelude
Space Fighter Hiding your Reality
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License

WORKS CITED/REFERENCES

O’Grady, Paul. Relativism. McGill-Queens University Press. 2002.

Quine, W.V. “Epistemology Naturalized,” Ontological Relativiity and Other Essays. NY:Colombia University Press, 1969. 69-90.

Quine, W.V. “On What There Is,” The Review of Metaphysics, volume 2, number 1. 1948. 21-28.

(sorry if my website citing is imperfect, feel uncertain about it)

#Philosophy
#Quine
#Ontology
#epistemology

[davidmoura]

The video and the explanation is amazing, but the background music is a bit too loud.

[namaste]

This is, by far, the most non-native english speaker friendly philosophy videos In all my experience as a philosophy major on the internet. I mean, you're talking about Quine that I would understand! Amazing job.

[Dr_Guerreiro]

OMG! I'm so happy that you've been posting recently, unfortunately, I haven't been able to keep up with all the videos, cuz I'm close to get my master's degree. But soon I will be delighted again by watching your content.

Keep it up! o//

[kristian.james-clement]

Delightful presentation of Quine. Made a difficult topic a lot easier to understand :)

[bon]

I think i will eventually read that book

[sina]

Good explanation, thank you. However, that music was very distracting. Especially that clanking sound. These ideas are hard enough to follow without all that extra commotion.

[HenryCasillas]

Åmazing Vîdeo 💜 (thank you for sharing such epįç content & congratulations) 🖖

[BelegaerTheGreat]

16:00 2+2=4 is also based on senses, I read.

[podcastuldefilosofie]

very cool! what program are you using for the illustrations?

[GottfriedLeibnizYT]

Do you think that "foundherentism" could resolve the circularity of coherentism?

[DanielL]

Philosophy is a 3 hour disclaimer to make 5 minute presentation. Babba is not relative, it IS Miller time.

[niallocuilleanain]

V interesting video, but one minor superficial criticism - speaking too fast. I tried slowing down the speed of playback in spots but just makes it a difficult listen. Perhaps slow down a little. Also no need for music. It distracts from the importance of your work and the message you are delivering. Interesting all the same.

[dangarfield]

The background noise makes this presentation uninteresting

[GottfriedLeibnizYT]

Is it safe to assume that Quine endorses "concept empiricism"?

[AdrienLegendre]

A priori human knowledge, the optimum brain structure for language learning, is the reason why humans learn language, but turtles do not in response to sensory experiences.

[Ortho_Clips]

How does one get in touch with you directly if I’d wanted to invite you to another podcast for a discussion?

[HarishKumar-lufd]

Nice content, but yes I agree to some comments, the background music is too loud and annoying. Its meddling with the focus required to understand things.

[devonashwa]

bro you spelled failures wrong at 7:57 other people might not notice but i got issues.

[ondrab]

What’s about the music?😂 Never felt that philosophy video could be so dramatic. 😅

[Axel-gnii]

Quine didn't consider the concept of genetic memory. Neuroscience is important to answer these questions as well