Second Phase of Indian National Movement | Class 10 ICSE History OneShot

preview_player
Показать описание
Second Phase of Indian National Movement | Class 10 ICSE History OneShot

Background/Causes of the rise of extremism
The failure of the moderate leaders in getting any significant results from the British authorities.
The limitations of the moderates were the main causes of the rise of extremism.
The partition of Bengal in 1905 opened the eyes of the Indians to the true colours of the British rulers.
Lord Curzon and his disdain for anything Indian also created resentment and anger against the foreigners.
There was a fear among some leaders that the moderates with their westernized notions were trying to create an India in the image of the West.
There was a revival of national pride at that time.
The extremist leaders were also influenced by the growth of spiritual nationalism at that time.
The Delhi Durbar held in 1903 when people had not fully recovered from the horrific effects of the famine that killed lakhs of people drew widespread condemnation.
Events happening around the world also inspired the extremist leaders. Abyssinia’s successful repulsion of the Italian army in 1896 and Japan’s defeat of Russia in 1905 shattered the notion of European invincibility.
Other national movements like in Persia, Egypt and Turkey also motivated the Indian leaders.
Surat Split
The differences between the moderates and the extremists became official in the Surat session of the Indian National Congress (INC) in 1907.
The meeting was to take place in Nagpur that year. The extremists wanted Lala Lajpat Rai or Bal Gangadhar Tilak to be the President. But the moderates wanted Rash Behari Ghosh as President. There was a rule that the session’s President could not be from the home province. Tilak’s home province was Bombay Presidency in which Surat was also situated. So, the moderates changed the venue to Surat so that Tilak could be excluded from the presidency.
The moderates also wanted to drop the resolutions on swadeshi, boycott movements and national education.
Rash Behari Ghosh became the president in the session which was held at Surat.
Tilak was not even allowed to speak and this angered the extremists, who wanted to cancel the session.
Both sides were firm on their demands and neither was willing to find a common path.
The moderates then held a separate meeting in which they reiterated the Congress goal of self-government within the British Empire and to adopt only constitutional methods to achieve their goals.
Unfortunately, the Surat session was marred by the use of sticks and chappals by the members on one another.

Methods of Extremist Leaders

The extremist goal was ‘swaraj’. This, at that time, either meant complete autonomy and freedom from British control, or a total Indian control over the administration but not necessarily a break away from Britain’s imperial reign.
This was in contrast to the moderates’ demand of only an increase in the share of Indians in the administration and military upper echelons.
The extremist leaders involved wider sections of people in the movement. They involved lower-middle-class people also.
They did not stick to constitutional methods to protest and demand. They resorted to boycotts, strikes, etc. They also burned foreign-made goods.
They believed in confrontation rather than persuasion.
The Swadeshi movement gathered momentum in India because of the extremists’ support. This led to the establishment of Indian banks, mills, factories, etc.
They were strongly against British imperialistic policies in India.
They took pride in Indian culture and history. They looked at the ancient scriptures for inspiration and courage.
They believed in sacrificing everything including life for the cause of the motherland.
They opposed westernisation of Indian society by the British.

They did not believe in loyalty to the British Crown.
Extremist leaders
Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal (the first three called Lal-Bal-Pal leading the extremist cause in Punjab, Bombay and Bengal respectively.)
Other leaders included Aurobindo Ghosh, Rajnarayan Bose, A K Dutt, V O C Pillai.
Government reaction to extremists
The government attacked the extremist leaders vigorously.
Laws were passed to check their activities and influence. The following laws were passed between 1907 and 1911: Seditious Meetings Act, 1907; Indian Newspapers (Incitement to Offences) Act, 1908; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908; and the Indian Press Act, 1910.
Tilak was sentenced and served in prison in Mandalay (Burma) for writing in support of revolutionaries who were involved in the killing of two British women (their original target was a British magistrate).

The slogan “Swaraj is my birthright and I shall have it” by Tilak was the talk of society.
British goods and national education was boycotted which brought a major change in the economy of the country and gave way to employment and various other opportunities for the Indians.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

very bad video L



















































just kidding guys

RationalPea
Автор

Gopal Krishna Gokhale is influenced by the Justice Ranade

kushagrasahu
Автор

Truly grateful bhaiya, respect for your efforts. Thankyouuu!

umeshsodmise
Автор

Why this channel is soo underrated Inse acha kon smjha skta he yarr... Thank u soo much for this kind help ✨😊

ishratbano
Автор

bhaiya plz geography🗺️🌏📗ka maping (topographic) karwa dijiye

sanskariBahu
Автор

The Surat Split was the splitting of the (INC) Indian National Congress into two groups - the Moderates and Radicals aka extremists - at the Surat session in 1907.

AkshatSrivastava-ljyi
Автор

My best youTuber which treat us as a friend😊

sanskariBahu
Автор

U r just awesome
But vdo is not consistent 😢




Overall chapter wasss jst so mazedar😅😊❤
Overall chpter was mazedar

tannujaiswaljaiswal
Автор

Hello bhaiya plz tell about reduced portion in 10 2023-24

DwijPatel-kvnu
Автор

History and civics ka full shot plz short me

varunthakkar
Автор

I'm watching this video .. at morning 😂😂 of my exam all the best to mee

smile.
Автор

Mera kl internal exam h or 6 chapter history ke aa rhe h Orr aaj mai apki vdos dekh rhi hu or mujhe bhut help mil rhi h aapki in vdos se ....thank you bhaiya🙏🏻 ❤️

divyanshiverma
Автор

Bhaiya mere school mein bohot kuch cancelled he toh kya aap video mein segments kr sakte ho taaki dhundne me easy hojaye

sohamshirke
Автор

Please tell the history syllabus of 2023-24

ashvinide
Автор

Your way of teaching is really very good.... I'm really happy to complete this amazing chapter taught my the most amazing teacher ❤️❤️

sameeraahmed
Автор

❤❤❤ hello pls reduced syllabus for 23-24 😢😢

Sam-mjkl
Автор

The issues on which the two wings of the Congress had differences of opinion were-

The Assertive Nationalists wanted to extend the Swadeshi and boycott to the rest of India and make it a vehicle for a full-fledged political mass struggle leading to Swaraj. The Early Nationalists, however, did not approve it for the whole of India and wanted it to be confined to Bengal only.
There was also a disagreement over the candidature of the next President. The Assertive Nationalists proposed the name of Lala Lajpat Rai as President of the Surat Session. The Early Nationalists proposed the name of Rashbehari Ghosh. When the session at Surat began in December 1907 there was utter confusion.
The British exploited the differences between the Early Nationalists and the Assertive Nationalists. The British adopted a policy of 'concession and repression' — concession for the Early Nationalists as well as the Muslims and repression to the Assertive Nationalists.

AkshatSrivastava-ljyi
Автор

help me plz my school was not complete syllabas i study this chapter in november

Aryankukreticlassth
Автор

Gopal krishna gokhake was inspired by Ranade❤

leenabhalenare
Автор

Geography toposheet please G43S7 and G43S10

pri-