filmov
tv
Mecca was never on any Trade Route - Surprised?
Показать описание
In the 20th century Muslims scholars, along with Western Orientalists had a problem explaining how Mecca got its wealth, since it is in such an arid place, and off the 'beaten tract' from everywhere important. How could such a backward city become important and then be the basis for the subsequent Islamic Empires of the Umayyads and the Abbasids?
This dilemma was supposedly solved by Dr Montgomery Watt, a Christian Clergyman, who was also a well known Orientalist Scholar.
He suggested that due to the wars between the Sassanian (Persian) and the Byzantine (Christian) empires in the 5th - 7th centuries, the trade route which normally went through the Persian Gulf was shut down, and had to be redirected south, across the Arabian Sea, to the city of Aden (in what is today Yemen), where the goods were taken off the ships and were transported overland by camels 1250 miles up via the Western Plateau of Arabia to Gaza in the north.
This was a real coup for Watt who was feted with finally solving the problem of Mecca's importance, since he suggested that Mecca controlled that trade, and that is where the city made its wealth, and thus could be the basis for the subsequent Muslim empires.
At then end of the last century, Dr Patricia Crone, a leading scholar on the Middle East, looked at a map and immediately saw problems with this theory, which no one seemed to have noticed before.
To begin with, Mecca, she said, was not situated correctly to be on a trade route which followed the Western plateau, because it sits to the west of the plateau, and in fact over 1,000 meters below the plateau. In order for the camel caravans to pass through Mecca, they would have to leave the plateau at Taif, and head down 1,000 meters to Mecca, which was barren, with very little water, and thus could not have accommodated caravans of large herds of camels.
What's more they would then have to go back up over 1,000 meters to get up to Yathrib, which was also on the plateau. Why would caravans come down off the plateau to a city which could not have accommodated their camels, knowing that they would then have to climb back up the 1,000 meters to get to Yathrib?
But more troubling was the suggestion by Watt that having already crossed the Arabian Sea on boat, they would then take off all their goods at Aden, and then head up the Arabian peninsula, to Gaza, which was over 1250 miles away.
Why, Crone asked, didn't they just continue to keep the goods on the ships and float freely up the Red Sea? She found that taking a ton of goods only 50 miles by land would cost the same amount as taking that same ton of goods 1250 miles by Sea! It would have been prohibitively expensive to take their goods by land.
So, she decided to check out her theory. She could read and write 15 archaic languages, and so was able to go to the original documents from that era, and from those countries; and she found that all of the trade, from the 2nd century onward was all maritime (by Sea); that none of it went by land, and that there were no Arabs who controlled the sea trade. It was the Adalusians, from Eritrea, in Africa whose names were on the trading documents, and no Arab names, proving that the trade had more to do with Africa than Arabia.
In one fell swoop, she had debunked Dr Watt's trade Route theory, proving that Mecca had nothing to do with the trade at all.
So, then how did Mecca become famous and important and rich? Well, it never was, at least not in the 7th century or before. Mecca only became powerful and important once Islam was taken over by the Abbasids, who made it the center for their sanctuary, thus, after 749 AD, but that is over 100 years after Muhammad supposedly lived there, proving once again that Mecca was never in existence during Muhammad's lifetime, nor during the century in which he lived.
© Pfander Centre for Apologetics - US, 2021
(45,560) Music: 'happy child', by Aleksound, from Filmmusic-io
This dilemma was supposedly solved by Dr Montgomery Watt, a Christian Clergyman, who was also a well known Orientalist Scholar.
He suggested that due to the wars between the Sassanian (Persian) and the Byzantine (Christian) empires in the 5th - 7th centuries, the trade route which normally went through the Persian Gulf was shut down, and had to be redirected south, across the Arabian Sea, to the city of Aden (in what is today Yemen), where the goods were taken off the ships and were transported overland by camels 1250 miles up via the Western Plateau of Arabia to Gaza in the north.
This was a real coup for Watt who was feted with finally solving the problem of Mecca's importance, since he suggested that Mecca controlled that trade, and that is where the city made its wealth, and thus could be the basis for the subsequent Muslim empires.
At then end of the last century, Dr Patricia Crone, a leading scholar on the Middle East, looked at a map and immediately saw problems with this theory, which no one seemed to have noticed before.
To begin with, Mecca, she said, was not situated correctly to be on a trade route which followed the Western plateau, because it sits to the west of the plateau, and in fact over 1,000 meters below the plateau. In order for the camel caravans to pass through Mecca, they would have to leave the plateau at Taif, and head down 1,000 meters to Mecca, which was barren, with very little water, and thus could not have accommodated caravans of large herds of camels.
What's more they would then have to go back up over 1,000 meters to get up to Yathrib, which was also on the plateau. Why would caravans come down off the plateau to a city which could not have accommodated their camels, knowing that they would then have to climb back up the 1,000 meters to get to Yathrib?
But more troubling was the suggestion by Watt that having already crossed the Arabian Sea on boat, they would then take off all their goods at Aden, and then head up the Arabian peninsula, to Gaza, which was over 1250 miles away.
Why, Crone asked, didn't they just continue to keep the goods on the ships and float freely up the Red Sea? She found that taking a ton of goods only 50 miles by land would cost the same amount as taking that same ton of goods 1250 miles by Sea! It would have been prohibitively expensive to take their goods by land.
So, she decided to check out her theory. She could read and write 15 archaic languages, and so was able to go to the original documents from that era, and from those countries; and she found that all of the trade, from the 2nd century onward was all maritime (by Sea); that none of it went by land, and that there were no Arabs who controlled the sea trade. It was the Adalusians, from Eritrea, in Africa whose names were on the trading documents, and no Arab names, proving that the trade had more to do with Africa than Arabia.
In one fell swoop, she had debunked Dr Watt's trade Route theory, proving that Mecca had nothing to do with the trade at all.
So, then how did Mecca become famous and important and rich? Well, it never was, at least not in the 7th century or before. Mecca only became powerful and important once Islam was taken over by the Abbasids, who made it the center for their sanctuary, thus, after 749 AD, but that is over 100 years after Muhammad supposedly lived there, proving once again that Mecca was never in existence during Muhammad's lifetime, nor during the century in which he lived.
© Pfander Centre for Apologetics - US, 2021
(45,560) Music: 'happy child', by Aleksound, from Filmmusic-io
Комментарии