Dr Disrespect CONSPIRACY Confirmed By Nickmercs! MASSIVE Layoffs Over Clout Chasing Woke Weirdos!

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

17 - minor
18 - Onlyfans
What is this world

oolavitzoo
Автор

Please Don't forget about Mr Beast and His Registered PDFs

johnw
Автор

Why is no one talking about Kris Tyson anymore….

PointsMaster
Автор

"Under California Penal Code 288.2 PC, sexting with a minor is illegal, regardless of whether the minor consented. Sexting between two minors is also illegal." If he had been doing this, don't you think charges would have been brought at some point? And I might be crazy, but what happened to innocent until proven guilty?

nathanwilliams
Автор

Why is everyone forgetting that the clout chaser was using this information to promote his band?

SgtHouse
Автор

the response towards Dr Disrespect is 1000x worse than ANY other streamer. Mr beasts pet was absolutely disgusting grooming a THIRTEEN year old, SHARE PHOTOS with him and even MET UP with him (when 16).. disgusting man... and everyone only piles on doc?

wtf is wrong with people

nelsoc
Автор

what I find funny is he never said he was talking sexual to a minor. People just think inappropriate means a sex thing.

arteyus
Автор

I believe Dr. Disrespect said the messages weren't sexual but they could be considered inappropriate. So, if being inappropriate was a crime, everyone who participated in roasting kids in Halo and Call of Duty lobbies back in the Xbox 360 days needs to be in prison.

doubleboeNYC
Автор

If he’s such a predator where’s all these victims queuing up to ruin him? None.

zepho
Автор

Nick Merced and Timmy tenders are punks.

selder
Автор

Here’s the simple facts. there was no crime committed! You can cry and cope all you want. You can nit pick and act like a saint in comment sections. It changes nothing. There are far too many people too comfortable slinging life changing accusations around thinking there is no consequences. In real life that wouldn’t fly for a second. Doc is more successful than you will ever be. This is all the same cancel culture, believe all women cringe virtue signaling. Its pathetic.

Marlboro-lights
Автор

The same Nick that jumped off the Dr Disrespect ship on day 0?
Talk about grifting

AncestorEmpire
Автор

Where was the up roar when Paul Walker in his thirties dated a 16 year old or Leonardo DiCaprio dating somebody who was 18 at the time and he is like what in his 50’s? 17 a minor…18 welcome to pornhub and onlyfans…crazy world we live in.

allenrigsby
Автор

Like NICKNERCS has never inappropriately trash talked a minor in game or made some adult joke not even knowing or caring how old the people he's talking to or about are? This is pure hypocrisy and cowardly. Doc shouldn't have been messaging this person but with the facts we have now it really doesn't seem he crossed any lines that other similar streamers do all the time. That is not justification for Docs actions but a glaring hypocrisy among many of these streamers.

mr.makeshift
Автор

You notice once he lost everything, the flood of actual preds were exposed . They barely got as much backlash and slender as The Boss did. Instead they gained more subscribers, gained more sponsorship, and retained their monetization.
Since Doc returned... I'm still waiting for the justice warriors to talk about the people who've done the actual acts with the "underaged individuals, " AS THEIR CRIMINAL RECORDS ARE STILL ON DISPLAY FOR THE WORLD TO SEE!

DEMONX
Автор

Nick was one of the first to bail on Doc. The coward.
Tim is a spineless blob and ZLaner... don't even get me started on that worm.
As for the lay offs, well, they got it coming for them when they've decided to "protect" the company by firing him in the first place.
Don't feel an ounce of pity.

COLT_Chris
Автор

The thing that’s bothering me is that Twitch paid his contract. Their community guidelines define a minor as anyone under 18 so age of consent does not matter. The punishment is immediate and indefinite suspension. It also says “Content that constitutes or facilitates inappropriate interactions with youth, including grooming, purposefully exposing youth to sexually explicit language or sexual material, and engaging in sexual conversations in messages with youth.” So if he had sexual conversations with someone under 18 he would have broken community guide lines. Why would twitch lose the case and have to pay out his contract? Am I thinking wrong about this? Is there a way he could break those rules and still get paid out?

Whodey-hddd
Автор

Doc said his comment leaned in the direction of being inappropriate.
He didn't say he was sexting a child. This is wild

kek
Автор

Mercs is a streamer. If he’s really saying that he himself never talks to minors, he’s full of 💩. His streams say otherwise.

jezeusbryce
Автор

I disagree with Doc needing to reveal the whispers to prove his innocence because, as has been litigated, it is the responsibility of the accuser (Twitch and that one former employee, in this case) to prove his guilt. And in this case, law enforcement never saw a problem.

Doc gains nothing from revealing the whispers (which would likely be sealed in the documents from the previous litigation no one is supposed to talk about which is why he can’t reveal them); in fact, it’s likely he will only get attacked over decontextualized messages by the exact same people that were already attacking him.

ky