Michio Kaku: These Galaxies PROVE The Big Bang Theory Wrong!

Michio Kaku: These Galaxies PROVE The Big Bang Theory Wrong!

Videos on Factnomenal are based for entertainment purposes only. Enjoy the content, but always verify with your own research before drawing conclusions.

Thanks for watching Factnomenal!
🌎 Subscribe for more space discoveries, space facts, and space in general!
🔔 Hit the bell next to subscribe so you never miss a video!

► For copyright matters, make sure to send us an email at

[dialectic-scietist]

The redshift doesn't mean the expansion of the universe. The redshift means only that the portion of light from an old galaxy position is about to end. That is because we do not see galaxies in real-time, but because of the distance we see only old galaxies images and from these old images the light, intime, will end and it has for that has a step by step depletion in its energy.

[MasterCadDesigns]

The shift in wavelength occurs because of motion, not the stretching of space. Take the stars in the Andromeda galaxy as reference. One side of the galaxy the stars are shifted into the blue end of the spectrum while the other side they are shifted into the red end of the spectrum while the stars moving parallel to our motion produce very little change in the wavelength of the spectrum. This indicates the stars are orbiting the central core in a particular direction. Then we can take the average shift in wavelength and we determined the Andromeda galaxy is moving towards us at about 225, 000 mi/h. Thus the shift in wavelength is not produced by expanding space. Like I said, it's produced by motion of the star or galaxy relative to our motion.

[deathbreach]

What if matter pops into existence filling up a universe bubble.
Kinda like poking a straw through a bubble to add more air.

Overtime the matter began forming into what we know as physics depending on the abundance of certain unknown materials that popped in and coalesced before everything else?

Idk tho

[Darkwintre]

What they're seeing is from how many years ago?
And because of that they assume our galaxy isnt that old?
Ever consider they are that much older and our galaxy is actually that old, its just they're even older!

[dialectic-scietist]

The answer about the rejection of the BB is, that if we reject the BB, then there isn't any place for a god in cosmology, ha ha ha ha ha!

[carlstreet]

Assumptions. Solving science problems for centuries.

[ronaldkemp]

In the first paperback book I published in 2021, 3 months before the JWST was launched I said the JWST would find old, fully formed galaxies, some larger than our own Milky Way but further than 14 billion light years away. I also said the discovery would become the mother of all paradoxes because it would refute the big bang, age of the universe, how the galaxies formed, relativity, look back time, and the evolutionary cosmological model of the universe. On page 48 of the first paperback book published Sept. 27, 2021 I wrote quote "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light years away." I didn't shoot in the dark and propose many different scenarios and hope that one would be right. I went into detail on why the JWST would discover the massive old galaxies so far away. It has to do with quantum entanglement.

I was right and astronomers still don't know how to fix the impossible early galaxy problem, yet I solved it before the JWST was launched. I solved the paradox before the first CEERS survey was released. I solved the paradox before it even became known as a paradox.

[Beano]

Maybe people can start believing in God. Instead of an atom formed from nothing and exploded and created a perfect and complex universe.