filmov
tv
DDE OS#3, Community vs Society, 2022-07-19
Показать описание
Democratic Dialogic Education, Open Symposium#3, 2022-07-19
"Community vs. society: The normative vision of sociality in joint self-education" by Eugene Matusov
Abstract: In this theoretical essay, I argued that the normative sociality of joint self-education is a society based on pluralism and tolerance of culturally and educationally diverse communities and individual educatees, their synergy, voluntary participation, and acceptance of the final sovereignty of their educational decision-making. I rejected a proposal that community (e.g., “community of learners”) should be the vision of this norm for such educational sociality. At the same time, I accept that an empirical community can be a very important part of a normative notion of society as applied to joint self-education. Balancing between communal, often centripetal, and societal, often centrifugal, processes is often necessary for maintaining a joint self-education endeavor.
Mentioned References:
Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Graeber, D., & Wengrow, D. (2021). The dawn of everything: A new history of humanity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rietmulder, J. (2019). When kids rule the school: The power and promise of democratic education. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Schwartz, H. (2014). The culture of the copy: Striking likenesses, unreasonable facsimiles. New York: Zone Books.
Shklovskii, V. B., & Sher, B. (1990). Theory of prose. Elmwood Park, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.
Sidorkin, A. M. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools, & dialogue with evil. New York: P. Lang.
Strathern, M. (2020). Relations: An anthropological account. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Tan, A. (2019). The Joy Luck Club. New York: Penguin Books.
Waugh, L R. (1980). The poetic function in the theory of Roman Jakobson. Poetics Today, 2 (1): 57–82. doi:10.2307/1772352.
"Community vs. society: The normative vision of sociality in joint self-education" by Eugene Matusov
Abstract: In this theoretical essay, I argued that the normative sociality of joint self-education is a society based on pluralism and tolerance of culturally and educationally diverse communities and individual educatees, their synergy, voluntary participation, and acceptance of the final sovereignty of their educational decision-making. I rejected a proposal that community (e.g., “community of learners”) should be the vision of this norm for such educational sociality. At the same time, I accept that an empirical community can be a very important part of a normative notion of society as applied to joint self-education. Balancing between communal, often centripetal, and societal, often centrifugal, processes is often necessary for maintaining a joint self-education endeavor.
Mentioned References:
Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Graeber, D., & Wengrow, D. (2021). The dawn of everything: A new history of humanity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rietmulder, J. (2019). When kids rule the school: The power and promise of democratic education. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Schwartz, H. (2014). The culture of the copy: Striking likenesses, unreasonable facsimiles. New York: Zone Books.
Shklovskii, V. B., & Sher, B. (1990). Theory of prose. Elmwood Park, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.
Sidorkin, A. M. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools, & dialogue with evil. New York: P. Lang.
Strathern, M. (2020). Relations: An anthropological account. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Tan, A. (2019). The Joy Luck Club. New York: Penguin Books.
Waugh, L R. (1980). The poetic function in the theory of Roman Jakobson. Poetics Today, 2 (1): 57–82. doi:10.2307/1772352.
Комментарии