What does a Probability Theory PhD Qualifying Exam look like?

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

In question 8a), M_{t} looks like the Dolean-Dades exponential martingale, which solves the basic differential equation of geometric Brownian motion, and its expectation is always one.

sdm
Автор

Very much turning into my favorite channel, even though I can I know what some of the notation means these questions seem like they're in a different language. xD

jacoblewis
Автор

Man. I’m
So scared for this when I take this in my stats PhD

prod.kashkari
Автор

It's relieving that at least this exam seems to give some freebies (e.g. the ones about definitions), and the problems seem to be short or with hints on what theorem to apply. It's very unlike the real analysis exam which made you memorize the proofs of all different theorems and also test your problem solving abilities to the max.

FT
Автор

The sequence where X_n = n in the interval [0, 1/n) and 0 everywhere else doesn't converge to anything in L^1. The only thing it could converge to is the 0 function (after all, if there is a set of positive measure where the limit function f differs from 0 then at some point most of that set is outside the interval [0, 1/n) and the L^1 norm of X_n - f would be strictly positive for all n after that). But the function does not converge to 0 either because it would need to converge to 0 in norm and the norm of X_n is 1 all the time.

MK-
Автор

Dominican Graduate Student here from an MSc in Applied Math, taking stochastic calculus now and definitely seeing how much I have left in probability haha

manuelcastellanos
Автор

This is more in my lane, as a masters degree in mathematical finance. I had to take the PhD level probability course twice (was an optional course for me, but glad I took it), to improve my grade from D to B. About 3000 thorems to remember and be able to prove.

pandabearguy
Автор

Me just finishing calc 1 tryna understand this 😅

marvingordon
Автор

No, there's no way 5 is that easy, right?.

The X_n are given to be independent, and we are given the distributions of each which are identical. Hence let the common distribution be X. We have E(X) = 0, E(X^2) = 1/2 = Var(X).

If S_n is defined as customary (the sum of the first n random variables), then by the (classical) central limit theorem, S_n/n -> N(E(X), Var(X)/n) in distribution. Hence, S_n/sqrt(n) -> sqrt(n)N(E(X), Var(X)/n) = N(E(X)sqrt(n), Var(X)) = N(0, 1/2) in distribution

abblabaabblaba
Автор

I am finishing a bachelor degree in Statistics and in my opinion I could pass this test with 1 month of study. I thought it was way harder

lucianozaffaina
Автор

WoW. The whole comment section is smarter than me

aryann_s
Автор

What probability theory and statistics books would you recommend?

sigma
Автор

Hearing convergence outside of a real analysis context is frightening

Undergraddiary
Автор

this seems way too trivial for a PhD exam

Dealinq
Автор

this is almost far too easy for my skill level. actually, on second examination, this is definitely too easy for my skill level.

robloxguy
Автор

A sophomore in my Statistics undergraduate course can answer these.

dominicgamboa