Nikon 300mm f2.8 vr VS Nikon 200mm f2 vr

preview_player
Показать описание
This is a comparison about Nikon's two excellent lenses. Nikon 300mm f2.8 vr versus Nikon 200mm f2 vr.

This are both amazing performers in terms of image quality. Sports,wildlife,portrait, you can shoot a lot of different things with these beasts!
After using them for sometime I decided to go for 300mm f2.8 vr. The only reason is: i needed the reach more than the wider aperture. When you are sooting wildlife, you can never get enough focal length!
If i was not shooting wildlife, i would choose the 200mm f2. But if i could afford the 400mm f2.8 vr + the 200mm f2 vr This would be an epic combo.

Teknoaxe has the coolest musics please check them up!

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

These are nicely made, to the point, and helpful. Thank you. I am subscribing.

winedemonium
Автор

Super informative video in 2025, thank you so much ❤

Ericho-dt
Автор

The first time I've seen a comparison (and a good one) of these lenses, I can't thank you enough...  Great job..!!!  It would've been nice for you to comment more accurately on the distances between you and the model for us to have a better sense of the usage of this great lenses; definitely keep them coming.

Thank you.

harrisedgar
Автор

Nikon 300mm f2.8 vr VS Nikon 200mm f2 vr !

BigLensAdventures
Автор

GREAT REVIEW! I just couldn’t decide between the two, although I have owned the Canon version previously. Currently both the Canon and Nikon 200mm f2.0 versions are discontinued, so the only option I have is the 300mm f2.8

dakotaxu
Автор

I was sick when i prepared this video and the next day we were flying to Johannesburg South Africa. (13 hours of flight)  You can read it in my face clearly :)

BigLensAdventures
Автор

Very Nice Presentation again, Thanks for Sharing the Most Incredible, Definitely one of Nikon's Best and Excellent piece of Lenses.Without Doubt a Superb piece of Glass!!

augustinflores
Автор

Dear Özkan Özmen,

I would request you to draw comparison of two lenses i.e. Nikon 200 F2 with 1.4 TC will make it approximately 280mm at F2.8

Will Nikon 200mm match quality of image at 280mm and F 2.8 ? with 300mm F 2.8

srizwan
Автор

200mm f/2 VR2 is the best lens of Nikon is very different from 300mm VR2. Anyway the focal length of 300mm is more useful.

PatitoDiAnime
Автор

hi Ozkan, salam ...

which do you prefer for portaiture, fashion & beauty in studio or outdoor ??! ... 200mm or 300mm ??! ... 

btw, great presentation video ...

GeryRevandra
Автор

Thanks for an interesting video.  I have the 300mm f2.8 and the 200mm has always intrigued!  :-)

davegray
Автор

Eline saglik guzel tanitim olmus, memnun musun 300mm le ?

HKFoto
Автор

Hi Ozkan, apparently both lenses are out of my range, just wanted to know your thoughts on 85mm f1.8 or 135mm f2 dc, do you think 135mm is worth a shot?? using D610, appreciate your response.,

kinjat
Автор

"I was not able to tell the difference in terms of sharpness between these two lenses"?! Its obvious that 300mm is sharper than 200! Just see the eyes of the model and you will know! I wonder why you say this.

jonathanpoon
visit shbcf.ru