1v1 Arabia | Magyars vs Cumans | vs Hera

Показать описание

TheViper

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

Dear Mr. Viper. You are a great AOE player. I have enjoyed your content since late 2016 once I got back to this game. All those Silveboi comments although initially funny, I understand can get to you over time. I hope you are not taking them to heart and know that you have a huge fan base that is rooting for you to do well. Don't take the recent tournament losses to heart either. I hope you have a good vacation and get back to enjoying the game and your high levels. Cheers! :-)

markerdk

Ahh Viper trained with Daut. That explains EVERYTHING!

jeroen

“Hey man....Oh i wanted to go malay... i dont know how to magyars”

Bill-Piano

man the value of those scouts and lightcav! great snipes

stevealvarado

Cuman power really tapers off in the late game

bfshorts

Hey viper, you mentioned halb SO is also an option for cumans. Obviously not vs magyars, mongols and eagle civs i guess. Can you tell us the matchups in which it is a goto strat? When should I go just Onager halb with a third unit, and which third unit?

nemess_aoe

Question: if you go for aggressive feudal and maintain army/map control lead is it better to stay at say around 120 vils max and make sure they are always safe efficient with their collection rather than risking overbooming with say 150 vils?

One could say that putting out more army is obviously better but being able to replenish it even faster and for longer in late game as well as the fact you should still be able to to make sure your economy is safe might be better (obviously a more long term commitment and would probably take trash wars into account)

More specifically to this game, are hussars/CA supposed to be a cheaper combo than say paladins+skirms? Thus needing less vils?

zachariastsampasidis

Magyars are such an underrated civ 2 play and i Don t know why. They have good cavalary and archers ok infantry and diete(why are they și underrated?).

mihaibelu