Is O.J Innocent? The Missing Evidence

Think you know everything about the O.J. Simpson case? Think again. Don’t miss ID’s three-night special investigation. See new evidence and hear new theories that may finally expose the truth. The investigation re-opens Sunday January 15th at 9/8c.

[angiemaq]

Even if OJ did not do it, he knows who did and was some way involved.

[RiverRatt]

I watched this program and they were doing the same thing to Justin that they claim the LAPD did to OJ the older guy is so fixated to me he has no credibility and the younger guy is worse then Furman I would believe he would setup a crime scene before Furman would

[robs]

If this knife is the murder weapon, then the notion that Jason used one of his chef's knives goes out the window.

[cbkatz]

Both victims had DNA (Skin) under their fingernails from scratching the attacker and over 10 unidentified bloody finger prints at the crime scene. The skin under their fingernails and not one or the finger prints matched OJ.

[slikdarelic]

last time i checked, he was... NOT GUILTY!

[SSanf]

No need to watch. If they fond any exculpating evidence, it would have been all over the news long before now.

[nealpoffenberger]

The one question that i never got an answer to was, did the bloody glove have a cut on the same finger of oj's cut finger that would be very damning evidence if there was.

[KingJordanRadio]

Everybody's doing these shows cause The Ratings were great great for the FX Series This is not that and will fail

[jonathankeys]

He probably did it, but the investigation really failed to prove it period and his legal defense team was like The Avengers

[CarolineChiasson]

You know when you just dislike someone right away? That's how I feel about the young dude - sorry, I felt I needed everyone to know. ;)

[williammatthews]

IF YOU STAB TWO PPL 25 TIMES BETWEEN THE TWO AND YOU ONLY GOT ONE CUT ON YOUR FINGER THAT DONT ADD UP, YOU SHOULD HAVE ALOT MORE MARKS ON YOU AND SOME OF THE VICTIMS BLOOD ON THE KILLER.

[eriksmith]

Why was Jason blood not present? Oj did it

[jdheelfan]

This show has as much credibility as Finding Bigfoot.

[ElizabethAlvarez-ckvl]

sadly i dont have the investigation discovery channel where else can i watch the episode cuz i really want to watch can you upload them here pleaaaassse

[nateinman]

I do believe that he's a killer because he used to be abusive to Nicole Brown Simpson before he killed her and Ron Goldman

[charliesmith]

Interesting documentary, but it misses the main points of innocence which are:

1. OJ was not bleeding when he left for Chicago, meaning he could not have created that phony blood trail that does not lead back to Kato's room. The plan was to drug OJ and cut him on the left hand to match the fabricated blood trail.

2. Nicole deliberately had her mother leave her glasses behind. That means someone at the restaurant kept them safe until it was time for them to be found in the street. The Browns left around 9 p.m. and didn't leave the area until perhaps 9:25 p.m. and took 90 minutes to get home, the usual time, arriving just before 11 p.m. per their own original statement to the coroner. They later tried to change this. There is no way they got home by 9:37 p.m. to call about the glasses! That is why Juditha Brown never testified in the criminal case and a "stipulation" was made that she called at 9:37 p.m. and her phone records sealed by the court. If not, the jury would have been totally distracted by the fact that Nicole set Ron Goldman up to come over to her house using those glasses. They would know that Nicole called about the glasses herself at 9:37 p.m. pretending to be her mother, then called again after 3 minutes as herself to ask Ron to drop them off. Juditha Brown is still lyling about the time they left the restaurant.

3. There is no murder weapon because there was not enough opportunity to plant the murder weapon in OJ's luggage since by the time the murder weapon got to Rockingham Kato was in the yard helping to load the luggage. The limo driver was always in on the conspiracy, of course. The back-up plan was to bang on Kato's wall when OJ awoke from the drugs, which happened around 10:40 p.m. per Kato's testimony. Thus whoever planted the glove was part of the conspiracy as well and that explains where Mark Fuhrman got the glove. He purposely made Kato stay in the kitchen while he went and looked behind Kato's wall. The bloody glove must have been hidden some place in a plastic bag for Fuhrman, who then planted the glove then re-experienced finding it so he could describe his actions in a believable way to the court. But this backfried because while playing "good detective" he described the glove as still being "moist and sticky" which proves it had been recently planted. The only purpose for the bangs on the wall was to later time the planted glove.

4. The limo driver is a complete liar. There is no way the limo could have made the turn around a second car in the driveway if Arnelle's car was there, so there was no car in the drive way, though he tries to stick by his mistaken testimony. Plus there is no way from the gate that he could see the lights pop on. so his claim that someone in dark clothing entered the house and turned on the light was for the benefit of the court to suggest OJ had just come home. He also changed some of the facts. He claims to have called on the intercom around 10:55 p.m. shortly after he saw a figure in dark clothing enter the house. He then says he saw a man with a flashlight come to the gate and let him in. But by 10:59 p.m. OJ himself came out to help load the luggage. What he skips is that Kato was first seen coming outside with a flashlight around 10:52 p.m.! that means the bangs on the wall happened 12 minutes earlier around 10:40 p.m. as Kato testified. So that suggests OJ had arrived from the murders by 10:40 p.m. and had not entered the house until 14 minutes later, Don't forget, he first saw Kato with the flashlight, THEN he saw the dark figure enter the house and the lights come on. Does that make sense? When he first saw Kato with the flashlight Kato did not let him into the yard. There is no way the limo driver was not part of the conspiracy from the beginning. He had to lie about the Bronco and would have seen the agents planting the blood. So he along with Marcia Clark and Robert Shapiro and Mark Furhman are keeping the lies going.

[jonathankeys]

They didn't test the hair for DNA. At the time of the trial and investigation they had no way to test for DNA, because you need root material to test for DNA. Nowadays they can test for mitochondrial DNA which is in the cells hairstyles nail sales whatever kind of cells. It's something like 10% of the accuracy,

[weinerschnitzel]

Watching the show... they said that the hair in the black hat did NOT match OJ's DNA. If it was his sons hair, as accused in the show, it would have shown that the DNA was NOT OJ's BUT it would have shown that the "hair" belonged to his son.... No different than a paternity test. That is exactly how "the Grimm Sleaper" serial killer was caught. ( His nephew was arrested and his DNA was put into the CODIS system.) When the next serial killer victims' found DNA was ran; the nephew came up as a family match.

[jjlp]

oj is innocent.d.n.a didn't match oj ..

[Showmeflipper]

i have been watching this series and they were talking about the time card, saying that sunday was penciled in well i have a question if this the correct time card and he wrote in sundays times. then why are there another saturday and sunday at the bottom of the time card? looks like the work week went from monday to sunday, not sunday to sunday. also jason says that he took time off from work but worked tuesday and wednesday and then again on saturday and sunday..